Microbes aid heavy oil recovery in Venezuela
Carmen J. Partidas
Pdvsa E&P
Lagunillas, VenezuelaGariela Trebbau
Micro-Bac Venezuelas
CaracasThomas L. Smith
Micro-Bac International Inc.
Round Rock, Tex.
- Small well head platforms are common in Lake Maracaibo (Fig. 1).
- A triplex pump on a self-propelled barge was used to inject the microbial treatments (Fig. 2).
- Workers pour a microbial scale and corrosion inhibitor into a mixing tank (Fig. 3)
As an example, treatments with biotechnology products have enhanced heavy oil recovery in 25 Lake Maracaibo wells operated in the Petróleos de Venezuela SA Lagunillas district.
Three different reservoirs, LGINF-07, BACH-01, and BACH-67, were treated with microbial solutions (Table 1 [102,370 bytes]). These reservoirs produce heavy 10-19° API gravity crude.
Since the early 1920s, Venezuela has been recovering oil from Lake Maracaibo. Today, Lake Maracaibo has more than 7,000 wells, in water depths of up to 130 ft, producing mostly on gas-lift (Fig. 1).
Microbes
The microbial treatments in Lake Maracaibo included:- Para-Bac/S for controlling paraffins
- Ben-Bac for preventing asphaltene deposition and improving crude oil flow properties
- Corroso-Bac for protecting downhole and surface equipment from corrosion by sequestration, filming, and removing solids.
These biotechnology products are not chemical products, but their metabolic byproducts react similarly to chemicals.
In the well bore and deep in the formation, microbes work to enhance oil recovery. Living in the water phase, microbes colonize at the oil/water interfaces in the well bore and cling to porous media, especially water-wet reservoir rock. The microbe-inoculated fluid is pumped into the well bore and out into the formation where colonization and outward migration occur.
As production fluids flow through the microbe colony, the microbes produce biosurfactants, fatty acids, paraffin solvents, and gases, which are highly effective in mobilizing crude oil.
The microbes reduce paraffin accumulation, asphaltene agglomerates, and other problems in the well bore area as well as the reservoir. During the stimulation treatment, bioproduced surfactants and solvents decrease oil/water interfacial tension, altering effective permeability of oil by changing wettability characteristics, and lowering fluid surface tension.
Microbial byproducts also:
- Inhibit scale formation and corrosion
- Increase API gravity with bio-produced solvents, alcohols, and ketones.
The microorganisms can convert long chain n-alkane molecules into less-dense, short-chain molecules, which improves hydrocarbon mobility.
Application
Annular batch treatments and formation squeezes are two of the most common methods for applying microbial products in producing oil wells. The selected method depends on treatment goals and well characteristics.Annular batch treatments are intended to reduce well maintenance, while microbial squeeze programs aim to improve production from the formation.
In the 25 treated oil wells in Lake Maracaibo, the bottom hole temperatures ranged from 130 to 150° F. Microbial products can be effective in bottom hole temperatures of up to 270° F. The selected treatment method was a high-volume microbial squeeze.
Microbial solution was injected with a tubing squeeze procedure that placed the solution about 1-2 m into the producing formation. The solution was injected with a triplex pump from a self-propelled barge docked by the production platform (Fig. 2).
Solution preparation
The microbial solution contained filtered water from Lake Maracaibo and potassium chloride.The barge holds 650 bbl of solution in two compartments-500 bbl in the bottom compartment and 150 bbl in the top. The solution was prepared at the well site (Fig. 3).
To remove suspended solids prior to mixing, the lake water was strained through a 2-micron filter. The water (100 bbl) was pumped into the top holding tank where a centrifugal pump mixed the potassium chloride (KCl) and microbial products with lake water.
Powdered KCl concentrate was mixed at a concentration of 1.6% by weight, while the microbe concentration ranged from 8,000 to 54,000 ppm. Microbe concentration depends on the well shut-in time. The longer the shut-in, the lower the concentration.
The solution was transferred to the 500-bbl compartment after each 100 bbl was prepared. This procedure was repeated until the desired volume was prepared.
The thoroughly mixed solution was then transferred in 100-bbl intervals to the top compartment from which it was injected into the well with a triplex pump.
Injection procedure
The microbial solution ( Table 2 [126,067 bytes]) was injected at a rate of 3 bbl/min at a pressure greater than the well's bottom hole pressure. Care was taken so that the injection pressure did not damage the formation.The wells were then shut in between 5 and 15 days to allow the microbial colony to become established.
The solution in the first wells had low microbe concentrations, and the wells were shut in for longer periods. Because the operator preferred shorter shut-ins, the subsequent wells had higher microbe concentrations, and shut-ins were reduced to 5 days.
After the shut-in period, the wells were returned to production.
Testing and well data records were kept to provide on-going monitoring analysis. Data included:
- Whole oil/gas chromatography
- Saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes analysis
- Water analysis
- Viscosity, pour-point, and cloud-point analysis
- Testing procedures specific to microbial products.
Additional treatments
An optional proprietary surfactant was added to five of the treatments. The advantages of the surfactant include deeper penetration into the oil-bearing formation, faster production increases, and decreases in interfacial tension.When microbes penetrate the oil-bearing formation, the speed at which they migrate away from the well bore is inversely related to the formation obstacles that they encounter. The surfactant increases the penetration rate by removing various obstacles that slow down the penetration rate of the microorganisms.
Wells with a long history of chemical treatments may be more difficult to treat successfully with microbes. Poor results might be obtained because chemical residuals in well casing could be toxic to some microbial products.
Depending on chemical residuals in the well casing, a higher treatment dosage may be called for, or the well may need an additional treatment.
Results
Fig. 4 [13,019 bytes] shows the production performance of four of the treated wells. Each well had a significant production peak several weeks after the treatment.Of the four wells, Well LL-2241 shows the most sustained production after the treatment.
Overall, the three reservoirs had an 80% success rate, with increases in oil production of 50-200%, indicating that microbes are an alternative to traditional treatments.
The Authors
Carmen J. Partidas is the reservoir manager for the Tamare oil division of Pdvsa E&P, Lagunillas district, Venezuela. She is responsible for recommending and preparing new wells and evaluating new technology. Partidas has a petroleum engineering degree from the University of Zulia. She is a member of the College of Engineers of Venezuela and SPE.
Gabriela Trebbau is technology director of Micro-Bac Venezuela, in Caracas. She is responsible for research and business development for oil field products. Previously, she was with Intevep South America. Trebbau has an MS in microbiology from the University of Oklahoma. She is a member of the American Society for Microbiology (ASM), ASTM, and SPE.
Thomas L. Smith is vice-president of petroleum engineering with Micro-Bac International Inc., Round Rock, Tex. He is responsible for business development, engineering field support, and field testing new technology for enhanced oil recovery, formation stimulation, and flow assurance. He previous was with NL Industries. Smith has a petroleum engineering degree from Louisiana State University. He is an SPE member.
Copyright 1998 Oil & Gas Journal. All Rights Reserved.