Hate derivatives? How can you like cap-and-trade?

Bob Tippee
Editor

Political gyrations over financial and energy reform camouflage a wicked hypocrisy.

Financial reform legislation in the Senate treats derivatives as demonic. Derivatives are tradable financial instruments linked to physical commodities. Some are traded on centralized exchanges subject to regulation, others less formally in a hazy realm known as “over the counter” (OTC).

OTC derivatives receive much of the blame for the financial system’s unraveling in 2008.

Reform legislation would require that many derivatives now traded OTC instead be traded on regulated exchanges.

Attention to derivatives, with the purpose of tightening regulation of them, no doubt is in order. But the pressure on Congress to overreact is strong. Financial industry representatives say the Senate legislation goes too far.

Indeed, senators are just acting in character if they’re using derivatives as a scapegoat. They’d like voters to forget their own roles in the financial crisis, such as encouraging imprudent mortgage lending.

To crack down on existing derivatives while creating another one, moreover, seems wildly inconsisent.

The new derivative would be the tradable emission credit central to cap-and-trade systems for managing greenhouse gases.

Legislation passed by the House made emissions trading its centerpiece. The Senate has been wary of the House approach and may be in no mood to take up climate-change legislation before elections in November.

But Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) have written a bill that retains the cap-and-trade approach at least for utilities.

Prospects for their proposal are cloudy. While many senators don’t want to address the issue now, supporters of aggressive climate-change responses think now may be their best chance to ram a bill into law.

The push lost momentum when Graham threatened to withhold support after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in what many see as an act of political opportunism, made immigration reform his priority.

Political intrigue thus diverts attention from questions about a tradable financial instrument anchored to a license to emit greenhouse gases, the value of which would be determined by the government.

As derivatives go, nothing in existence now is more deserving than that of suspicion.

(Online Apr. 30, 2010; author’s e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

DOE approves LNG exports to non-FTA countries from Oregon project

03/24/2014 The US Department of Energy conditionally approved Jordan Cove Energy Project LP’s application to export LNG through its proposed terminal on Orego...

Watching Government: Alaska's ANWR reminder

03/24/2014 Alaska's state government apparently doesn't want people to forget there's still significant oil and gas potential beneath the Arctic National Wild...

Begich objects to House Democrats' NPR-A comment extension request

03/24/2014 US Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alas.) let three US House Democrats know he did not approve of their request for the US Bureau of Land Management to add 30 ...

EPA lifts post-Macondo contract suspension in agreement with BP

03/24/2014 The US Environmental Protection Agency and BP PLC reached an agreement that will effectively end the bar on new federal contracts imposed on the mu...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected