<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[RSS for Greenhouse Gas]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas news and technical articles from Oil & Gas Journal. Search Greenhouse Gas latest and archived news and articles]]></description>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/topics/]]></link>
<atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" href="http://www.ogj.com/topics/urss?pageid=782116"/>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sound policies needed to develop oil, gas resources, Watson says]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/06/sound-policies-needed-to-develop-oil--gas-resources--watson-says.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/06/sound-policies-needed-to-develop-oil--gas-resources--watson-says.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:47:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[US government policymakers should use the opportunity that a dramatically improved US oil and gas outlook provides to generate more federal revenue by reforming the federal tax code, increasing access to public lands, and encouraging more thoughtful environmental policies, Chevron Corp. Chief ...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Senators seek repeal of 2007 EISA provision]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/06/senators-seek-repeal-of-2007-eisa-provision.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/06/senators-seek-repeal-of-2007-eisa-provision.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:40:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[US Sens. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) introduced legislation to repeal a provision in the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) that bars federal purchases of transportation fuel produced from coal, oil sands, and oil shale.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Report sees gas as near-term, but far from only, GHG control option]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/06/report-sees-gas-as-near-term--but-far-from-only--ghg-control-opt.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/06/report-sees-gas-as-near-term--but-far-from-only--ghg-control-opt.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:59:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Using more natural gas could help reduce US greenhouse gas emissions in the near to medium term, but deeper long-term reductions will require broader deployment of other low-carbon energy sources as well, a new Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) report concluded.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Shrinking middle ground]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-6/regular-features/editorial/shrinking-middle-ground.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-6/regular-features/editorial/shrinking-middle-ground.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:56:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Given the option, issue managers at most oil and gas companies probably would prefer to let others fight over global warming. For them, neither side of the question is comfortable.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OGJ Newsletter]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-6/regular-features/ogj-newsletter.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-6/regular-features/ogj-newsletter.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[International news for oil and gas professionals]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CBO report examines carbon tax’s possible consequences]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/05/cbo-report-examines-carbon-taxs-possible-consequences.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/05/cbo-report-examines-carbon-taxs-possible-consequences.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 May 2013 18:15:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Establishing a tax on carbon would raise significant revenue for the federal government, but could have potentially serious general economic impacts, the Congressional Budget Office said in a new report.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CERI: Oil sands costs up 6.3-13.2% in year]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/05/ceri--oil-sands-costs-up-6-3-13-2--in-year.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/05/ceri--oil-sands-costs-up-6-3-13-2--in-year.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 29 May 2013 14:13:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[The estimated cost of producing bitumen in Canada has increased by 6.3-13.2% in the past year, depending on the production method, according to the Canadian Energy Research Institute.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Keystone XL's small business pluses would be big, House panel told]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-5c/general-interest/keystone-xl-s-small-business-pluses-would.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-5c/general-interest/keystone-xl-s-small-business-pluses-would.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 May 2013 01:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Completing the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline's construction would significantly benefit many US small businesses and skilled workers, three witnesses told a US House subcommittee.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Canada to EU: Don't penalize oil sands]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-5c/general-interest/canada-to-eu--don-t-penalize-oil-sands.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/volume-111/issue-5c/general-interest/canada-to-eu--don-t-penalize-oil-sands.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 May 2013 01:00:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Canada's minister of natural resources has warned officials of the European Union against "discriminatory treatment" of fuels made from products of Canadian oil sands.]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GOP senators to Obama: Approve Keystone XL on its own merits]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/05/gop-senators-to-obama--approve-keystone-xl-on-its-own-merits.html]]></link>
<guid>http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/05/gop-senators-to-obama--approve-keystone-xl-on-its-own-merits.html</guid>
<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 24 May 2013 13:36:00 EDT]]></pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[Approval of the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline project should be based on its merits, and not linked to higher taxes or more regulations, John A. Barrasso (Wyo.), John Hoeven (ND) and 22 other US Senate Republicans said in a May 23 letter to US President Barack Obama.]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
