He was not originally scheduled to testify. Then the US House Energy and Commerce Committee announced former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) would follow former Vice-President Al Gore (D) and former US Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) during the third full day of hearings Apr. 24 on proposed climate change legislation.
A Republican committee source told me negotiations began more than a week earlier to bring more balance to the hearings led by committee chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass), who chairs the committee’s Energy and Environment Subcommittee.
“It was especially obvious with the Gore-Warner panel. So the majority agreed to invite Gingrich,” she told me Apr. 27. The source didn’t say it, but the majority made the former speaker a solo witness instead of having him testify with Gore and Warner.
Gingrich delivered. He did more than simply reiterate his call to develop more domestic energy resources. He said that the proposal before the committee would not improve national security and address economic decline, but simply increase the power of government.
Cleaning up messes
“Have we learned nothing during the past 6 months? Consider: The US government failed to regulate Wall Street correctly, and the result has been trillions of dollars of taxpayer money to clean up the mess that politicians and bureaucrats created,” he said.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were supposed to manage mortgages, yet the US housing market collapsed in 2008, Gingrich continued. Washington politicians responded by making US taxpayers foot the bill.
“Now the bill before you would create a multi-billion dollar artificial market for carbon, regulated and managed by the US government, paid for by taxing every American who uses energy,” Gingrich told committee members.
“With $2 trillion up for grabs, the environmental pieties begin to be a little difficult to take seriously. Lobbyists have not been hired for good citizenship and idealism. Lobbyists have been hired to ensure their clients get rich off this new government-managed flow of cash,” he observed.
The Waxman-Markey draft got a few things right, he conceded. It restricts the US Environmental Protection Agency from regulating carbon. It supports technologies to use more coal in ways less damaging to the environment. And it promotes development of a smart electrical grid.
‘Intellectually dishonest’
But the bill provides more carbon reduction punishments than incentives, he continued. “This is simply an intellectually dishonest bill. It promises what it cannot deliver and then punishes what currently exists,” Gingrich declared.
That same day, committee Republicans asserted House rules to request an additional hearing so the minority could call more witnesses. A few from groups such as the Heritage Foundation had testified already. Ranking Minority Member Joe Barton (R-Tex.) said that 14 Republicans testified with 54 Democrats.
The GOP committee source said that was a modest improvement. Originally, only seven Republicans were scheduled, she told me.
