Paula Dittrick
Senior Staff Writer
Transocean Ltd., owner of the Deepwater Horizon semisubmersible drilling rig that exploded and sank following the Macondo well blowout on Apr. 20, 2010, said BP PLC used a poor well design and failed to properly confirm critical cement tests.
The incident killed 11 people on the semi and resulted in a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. BP, which operated the Macondo well, issued no immediate response to Transocean's report.
In releasing its investigation report on June 22, Transocean reaffirmed its earlier statements that the Deepwater Horizon blowout preventer was maintained properly. The BOP's inability to seal stemmed from circumstances caused by the deepwater well blowout, the drilling contractor said.
"It was overcome by the extreme dynamic flow, the force of which pushed the drill pipe upward, washed, or eroded the drill pipe and other rubber and metal elements, and forced the drill pipe to bow within the BOP," Transocean said. "This prevented the BOP from completely shearing the drill pipe and sealing the well."
A US Presidential Commission has said the incident stemmed from a number of separate risk factors, oversights, and mistakes by multiple parties and a number of causes.
Lawsuits pending
Many lawsuits remain pending regarding the spill. Earlier this year, a court-imposed deadline in a New Orleans federal court prompted a flurry of claims and counterclaims. BP filed litigation against Transocean and others providing equipment or services for the Macondo well (OGJ, May 2, 2011, p. 40).
BP previously reached a settlement with partner MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC and its affiliates, Mitsui Oil Exploration Co. Ltd. and MOEX USA Corp., which agreed to pay BP $1 billion toward the cleanup (OGJ, May 30, 2011, p. 24).
MOEX had a 10% stake in Macondo. A second settlement involved service company Weatherford International Inc., which agreed to pay BP $75 million toward spill-related costs.
BP executives say their legal experts continue working with other companies involved in the well, including Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Transocean, and Halliburton Co., regarding liability for spill expenses. Anadarko had 25% interest in the Macondo well. Halliburton was involved in cementing the well.
Transocean said it commissioned an internal investigation team of experts from relevant technical fields and specialists in accident investigation to review and analyze the accident.
Previously, Transocean asked the US Coast Guard to revise its draft report on a joint investigation by the USCG and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement into the Deepwater Horizon semi explosion and fire (OGJ, June 20, 2011, p. 20).
More Oil & Gas Journal Current Issue Articles
More Oil & Gas Journal Archives Issue Articles
View Oil and Gas Articles on PennEnergy.com
