A strong legal challenge needs to be made to the EPA finding that CO2 is harmful. The grounds would be that they have exceeded their authority and that they have misapplied science. A vigorous presentation needs to made in a fair court of the true science and a cross examination done on the junk science.
The recent facts are that the sun has changed from global warming to global cooling and that for about 10 years world temperatures are down as the sun spot cycle produces less radiation heat. Historical data shows that increases in atmospheric CO2 come AFTER the earth warms slightly and therefore cannot be considered a cause. Data shows that modest earth temperature-change cycles are normal and not related to man. The models predicting catastrophe are too simplistic and biased to be believable or relied on.
There are plenty of facts for a strong legal challenge, and a successful one would be of great benefit to the country and to many industries.
Larry Haverly
Denville, NJ