Energy bill negotiators postpone conference meeting

Oct. 24, 2003
US congressional Republican leaders in charge of a pending energy bill Friday delayed formal discussions on the package scheduled for Oct. 28 because of ongoing disagreements within their own party over tax incentives and new clean air amendments.

By OGJ editors

WASHINGTON, DC, Oct. 24 -- US congressional Republican leaders in charge of a pending energy bill Friday delayed formal discussions on the package scheduled for Oct. 28 because of ongoing disagreements within their own party over tax incentives and new clean air amendments.

"I am deeply disappointed to announce that we must again delay the conference on the energy bill that was scheduled for this coming Tuesday," said Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Pete V. Domenici (R-NM) Friday.

Domenici noted that the House and Senate leaders in charge of tax legislation, Sen. Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Finance Committee, and Rep. Bill Thomas, House Ways and Means Chairman (R-Calif.) were at an "impasse" over how to reform the excise tax on ethanol. Also in dispute are whether or not tax credits to encourage alternative energy production should be tradable, and whether tax laws should encourage the construction of new, cleaner coal plants and environmental upgrades to existing plants.

He added that the House does not want to compromise on a pending plan to update reformulated gasoline rules by lifting the oxygenated fuel requirement while still encouraging ethanol production. The Senate version largely phases out methyl tertiary butyl ether; the House version allows for a phase-down but also gives producers limited liability production not in the Senate bill. Domenici criticized the House's refusal to budge on the "faulty product liability production while continuing to oppose a reasonable phase-down."

Several states have banned MTBE because of groundwater concerns and several lawsuits are also pending. Domenici also said the House also was still insisting on a number of proposals to amend the Clean Air Act including one by Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) that would give some cities more time to meet smog rules.

Domenici said he knew the issues on the table are contentious, but said he would not give up efforts to pass a bill.

"I certainly understand the House's position on these matters. But I am a pragmatist. I have no intention of emerging from conference with a bill that cannot pass the Senate. I remain committed to developing a final conference report that will be supported by majorities of both Democrats and Republicans in the Senate."

But he also acknowledged the political will may not be strong enough to pass out a bill this year.

"I know we will eventually resolve these issues and get an energy bill. I would like that to be sooner rather than later, but it may be that more pressure needs to build to force compromise. That will happen as many of the tax incentives expire, and the [US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] continues to operate without clear, new statutory guidance.

"I have just been elected to a 6-year term. I plan to spend those 6 years as chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. I know we will get an energy bill. I will be patient, but how long should the country wait?" Domenici said.

Meanwhile, Domenici's counterpart in the House, Energy and Commerce Chairman Billy Tauzin (R-La.) downplayed the disagreements between the two chambers.

"No one said this was going to be an easy process, but the sky is not falling, and I remain convinced that Congress will deliver a comprehensive national energy bill this year. For weeks, all parties have been negotiating around the clock in good faith. This latest setback is a speed bump, not a roadblock. Just as football has a bye week, this is a time for all of us to regroup and refocus on the important task at hand."