Process simulator effective in de-ethanizer tower revamp

March 25, 2002
Revamping an existing plant to increase production with minimum investment is important in today's process industries. Revamping a process plant is more complex than building a new plant. Revamps require a thorough knowledge and expertise of detailed material and energy balances.

Revamping an existing plant to increase production with minimum investment is important in today's process industries. Revamping a process plant is more complex than building a new plant. Revamps require a thorough knowledge and expertise of detailed material and energy balances.

A process simulator is a powerful tool for identifying bottlenecks to achieve higher capacity.1 For some pieces of equipment like pumps, compressors, heat exchangers, etc., revamping is relatively straightforward. For example, replacing the impeller on a centrifugal pump or installing an additional pump in parallel to achieve higher capacity.

A distillation column, on the other hand, is a major cost component and simply replacing it during a revamp is not acceptable. Existing column performance must be understood and analyzed in a distillation column revamp.2

Process simulators are an extremely useful tool to perform revamps with considerable ease. A simulator has an extensive thermodynamic model database, unit operations library, and pure component databank for modeling the process.

This article presents a case history of using a process simulator as a tool for revamping an existing distillation column to establish additional throughput without a major hardware change.

The column was revamped for additional throughput by combining feed precooling and providing a side reboiler. This concept requires minimal hardware changes for columns excessively loaded at stripping section. The key to a successful revamp lies in setting the appropriate location and side reboiler duty.

This exercise demonstrates how a process simulator can help analyze column profiles and locate the side reboiler.

Distillation revamp

A revamp should increase column throughput. The new throughput will increase column traffic and, consequently, limit the reboiler and condenser. There are various revamping options available to overcome these constraints.

A simple and generally used approach is to use structured packing or high efficiency trays to handle additional column traffic and provide additional surface area to overcome the reboiler and condenser bottlenecks. A more careful analysis of the existing column may give insight on alternate revamping strategies that will lead to an optimum design.

Hydraulic loads in the stripping and rectification sections may vary substantially. If a column is typically hydraulically loaded more in the stripping section and less in the rectification section, adding heat at an intermediate tray between the feed and reboiler can help redistribute the load; column throughput can be enhanced without replacing internals.

Side reboiler

Using a side reboiler is useful for columns loaded relatively heavily in the stripping section.3 The heat load between the rectification and stripping sections can be balanced by varying the feed temperature. Feed preheating decreases reboiler duty and increases condenser duty while feed precooling has the opposite effect. Component physical properties influence the sensitivity of heat load variations with respect to feed temperature.

With a side reboiler:

  • Feed is precooled.
  • Condenser heat load decreases.
  • Vapor-liquid traffic in the rectifying section decreases.
  • Vapor-liquid traffic in the stripping section increases.
  • Reboiler heat load increases.

A side reboiler placed between the feed point and bottom tray reduces the tray load below the point where heat is added. It will also, to some extent, increase the tray load above the heat addition point.

With top section traffic reduced due to feed precooling and bottom section traffic reduced due to a side reboiler, column throughput can be increased so that column traffic, condenser heat duty, and reboiler heat duty remain the same.

When using this approach for a distillation revamp, the trick is to specify the side reboiler location and fix the heat addition rate that will give maximum overall capacity increase. This is a trial-and-error procedure with no simple formula.

Problem definition

Click here to enlarge image

In an LPG recovery scheme, ethane is removed from the main feed stream in a de-ethanizer column followed by a LPG column. LPG is the overhead product in the LPG column and the bottoms are mainly C5+. Fig. 1 shows the flow scheme.

Click here to enlarge image

A column with the feed stream shown in Table 1 was considered. The revamp study was performed on the de-ethanizer column. These specifications for overhead and bottom streams were fixed:

  • Ethane with 0.5 wt % propane in the overhead.
  • Bottom stream with 0.5 wt % ethane.

The simulation used single-pass Glitsch valve trays in the rectifying section and two-pass Glitsch valve trays in the stripping section.

The distillation column had 40 theoretical stages excluding the condenser and reboiler. Feed entered at Tray 20. This was the optimum feed location.

The de-ethanizer was swaged below the feed; the top section was 0.95 m diameter and the bottom section was 1.7 m diameter, with a tray spacing of 0.5 m in both sections.

Column top pressure was 30 kg/sq cm, feed rate was 40,000 kg/hr, and feed temperature was 65°C. The simulation used the Peng-Robinson thermodynamic method. After achieving the required specifications, further studies were performed with this model as the base case.

Tower simulation

Click here to enlarge image

A detailed analysis of the base case revealed that the column was heavily loaded in stripping section (Fig. 2). This was due to various factors.

Latent heat in the reboiler vapor is substantially lower than the overhead. Liquid molecular weight increases in the stripping section up to the bottom tray, resulting in lower vapor velocity and tray loading. With higher fluid temperature, however, liquid density is lower resulting in higher tray loading. The net overall result is increased tray loading between the feed and column bottom.

Click here to enlarge image

The column profile for this simulation case is tabulated in Table 2. Flooding at the feed tray was 51%, and it steadily increased towards the bottom. The bottom tray flooding was 79.8%, the recommended maximum for the column.

The top section was not hydraulically loaded (Fig. 2). The mass flow rate of liquid in the rectifying section was 12,000 to 16,000 kg/hr whereas the mass flow rate of liquid in stripping section was 60,000 to 75,000 kg/hr.

A further increase in throughput was not possible due to flooding limitations. The loading pattern, however, shows that if we could uniformly balance hydraulic load in the stripping section, it would be possible to revamp the column such that traffic in the stripping section's bottom trays would be similar to traffic before the revamp. Supplying intermediate heat in the stripping section at a suitable location would achieve this goal.

Feed precooling or preheating before it enters the column can also alter vapor-liquid traffic. However, feed preheat or precool will not help in altering the relative load in a section. Feed precooling accompanied with a side reboiler can, however, substantially increase column throughput.

Click here to enlarge image

Feed was precooled to 40°C. to lower the condenser duty and column rectification section loading. Table 3 shows the results.

Click here to enlarge image

Condenser duty was 22% lower (Table 4) compared to the base case. There was a corresponding increase of 15.5% in the reboiler duty.

Click here to enlarge image

Fig. 3 shows that stripping section loads increase with flooding, reaching an unacceptable value of 91.6%. Flooding on the top tray was 57.5%.

Adding an intermediate heat source below the feed tray will reduce the traffic below it.

Intermittent heat addition

The heat duty from a side reboiler must be determined by trial-and-error. A first estimate of the side reboiler duty uses the net differential duty between the base case and revamp case. Since the revamp case, however, was itself a function of side reboiler duty and location, it was extremely difficult to arrive at an initial estimate.

We observed that the total duty required for the revamp case was not equal to the base case plus a differential duty. It was a little less if heat was added at an intermittent location and was sensitive to where the heat was added.

Click here to enlarge image

For this case, the side reboiler added 1 million kcal/hr. A study was performed to evaluate the reduction in reboiler duty by varying the side reboiler location. Fig. 4 shows the results. There is no significant reduction in reboiler duty when the side reboiler is placed in the rectifying section. So, further studies varied the side reboiler location in just the stripping section.

Click here to enlarge image

The side reboiler was tried at Tray 25, 30, and 35. The condenser and reboiler duties, and column flooding at each stage were studied for each run. Fig. 5 shows the results.

Adding heat at an intermediate location decreased the loading below the heat addition tray and increased the loading above it. As the heat addition location was lowered, loading on the trays above the heat addition point was not as great.

Fig. 5 shows that maximum flooding in the stripping section reaches 82% when heat was added on Tray 35. This is more than the maximum flooding in the base case; so this heat addition point was not accepted.

When heat was added on Tray 30, maximum flooding in stripping section was 74.9%, lower than maximum flooding for the base case.

In the rectifying section, maximum flooding was 59.6%, lower than maximum flooding for the base case by 25.1%.

When heat was added at Tray 25, maximum flooding in the stripping section was 71%. Maximum flooding was 70% in the rectifying section, 12% lower than the maximum flooding for the base case.

Adding heat at Tray 25 gave more margin for flooding than Tray 30, when compared to the base case. Tray 25 was chosen as the optimum head addition point.

Revamp case

After side reboiler duty and location were finalized, column runs were performed to evaluate additional throughput. The feed rate was gradually increased and column parameters were analyzed.

At a throughput of 47,500 kg/hr, column hydraulic performance and duties were fairly close to the base case. Flooding in the column was compared to the base case.

Click here to enlarge image

Fig. 6 shows column flooding before and after the revamp.

Since intermediate heat is added on Tray 25, the maximum flooding point in the bottom section (Tray 24) is 80%. This matches closely with maximum flooding of 79.8% in bottom section (Tray 39) for the base case.

Maximum flooding in the revamped top section is 75.3%, well below the maximum flooding of 79.5% for the base case.

Condenser duty for the base case was 1.055 million kcal/hr and the condenser duty after the revamp remains at 1.06 million kcal/hr (Table 4). Reboiler duty before and after the revamp was 2.51 and 2.55 million kcal/hr, respectively.

The study revealed that there was no need to change the existing reboiler and condenser surfaces after the revamp. The column traffic limiting points were also maintained so that the internals did not have to be changed after the revamp.

Precooling the feed from 65 to 40° C. and adding 1 million kcal/hr of heat using a side reboiler at Tray 25 increased distillation column throughput by 18% without affecting product specifications.

Role of the simulator

We performed a similar exercise with different combinations of heat duty and heat addition points. We observed that the overall column throughput increase was less than 18% for all other cases.

This type of study is practically impossible to perform without the use of a process simulator.4-6

This case study is a classic example that stresses the importance of process simulators for revamping distillation columns or other complex operations within a process plant.

References

  1. Sloley, A., and Fraser, A.C.S., "Consider modeling tools to revamp existing process units," Hydrocarbon Processing, June 2000, pp. 57-63.
  2. Fair, J.R., and Seibert, A.F., "Understand distillation-column debottlenecking options," Chemical Engineering Progress, June 1996, pp. 42-48.
  3. Nye, J.O., Herzog, K., and Cheaney, S., "Use a side reboiler to increase tower capacity," Hydrocarbon Processing, September 1999, pp 51-56.
  4. Kister, H.Z., "Troubleshoot distillation simulations," Chemical Engineering Progress, June 1995, pp. 63-75.
  5. Kister, H.Z., "Distillation design," McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
  6. Dimian, A., "Use process simulation to improve plant operations," Chemical Engineering Progress, September 1994, pp. 58-66.

The authors

Click here to enlarge image

Atul Choudhari is a senior process engineer at Kvaerner Powergas India Ltd., Mumbai, India. His experience of more than 9 years includes flowsheet simulations and process optimization for petrochemicals, fine chemicals, and hydrocarbon processes. Choudhari also has experience in various debottlenecking and distillation revamping projects. He received his BS in chemical engineering from Marathwada University, Aurangabad, India.

Click here to enlarge image

Pradnya Gune is a principal process engineer at Kvaerner Powergas India Ltd., Mumbai, India. She has more than 10 years of process engineering experience in the field of petrochemicals and fine chemicals. Gune previously worked for Reliance Industries Ltd. She is a graduate engineer from the University of Mumbai, Department of Chemical Technology.

Click here to enlarge image

S. K. Saxena is a senior engineering manager (process), head of process for Kvaerner Powergas India Ltd., Mumbai, India. He has also worked for Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd., Humphrey & Glasgow Ltd., Engineers India Ltd., Bechtel Group Inc., and Petrofac International Ltd. in various capacities. Saxena has more than 25 years experience in process design, troubleshooting, and operations. His experience covers refining, petrochemicals, and fine chemicals. He has a masters in chemical engineering (design).