Anadarko settles legacy claims against Kerr-McGee for $5.15 billion

Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and subsidiaries it acquired when it bought Kerr-McGee Corp. in 2006 agreed to pay $5.15 billion to settle fraudulent conveyance allegations brought by the US government and co-plaintiff Anadarko Litigation Trust in the bankruptcy of Tronox Inc.

A federal bankruptcy court found in December 2013 that Kerr-McGee conveyed its oil and gas assets to a new entity with the same name and renamed the remaining holdings Tronox in an attempt to evade debts, including its environmental liability to clean up contaminated sites around the country, US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency officials jointly announced on Apr. 3.

They reported that of the settlement amount Anadarko has agreed to pay, $4.4 billion will be used for environmental cleanups and to settle environmental claims. It is the largest environmental enforcement recovery in DOJ history, the federal department said.

“This settlement agreement with the Litigation Trust and the US government eliminates the uncertainty this dispute has created, and the proceeds will fund the remediation and cleanup of the legacy environmental liabilities and tort claims,” Anadarko Chief Executive Al Walker separately said.

Evasive move

In his Dec. 12, 2013, opinion, Judge Allan J. Gropper of US Bankruptcy Court for New York’s Southern District agreed with the government and litigation trust’s charges that Kerr-McGee transferred out and spun off its oil and gas assets in 2005 to a newly formed entity with the same name to evade creditors and environmental liabilities.

Although it had been founded in 1929 as an oil and gas exploration and production operation, Kerr-McGee diversified into refining and marketing, uranium mining and processing, wood treatment, and manufacturing and use of chemicals including creosote and ammonium perchlorate. By the early 2000s, the Oklahoma City-based independent had discontinued all but its chemical and E&P operations but still was responsible for environmental, tort, workers’ compensation, and retiree and employee benefit liabilities related to the other businesses.

In 2001, Kerr-McGee began an internal reorganization, Project Focus, to separate its oil and gas business from its chemical business and legacy liabilities, according to Cropper. When it was unable to sell the chemical operations, the company decided to move it into a new entity, Tronox, which also assumed the legacy liabilities, in 2005. It was spun off a year later from Kerr-McGee, which Anadarko bought for $18 billion soon after.

Burdened by environmental and other legacy liabilities, Tronox sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New York’s Southern District in January 2009 and sued the defendants. It emerged from bankruptcy on Feb. 14, 2011, when the court confirmed its reorganization plan that included a settlement with various environmental regulators for $270 million and 88% of any net proceeds from the fraudulent conveyance litigation.

At the same time, Tronox established a litigation trust to pursue the action after its emergence from bankruptcy and to distribute any recoveries from the litigation to the trust’s environmental and tort beneficiaries. The US government intervened in the case under the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act to recover response costs for environmental cleanups at numerous sites around the country.

Settlement’s terms

Under the Apr. 3 settlement, which must go through a 30-day public comment and judicial review period before it becomes final, Anadarko and the subsidiaries will pay the settlement amount to the trust, DOJ said.

It said that under a 2011 agreement between the US government; certain state, local, and tribal governments; and the bankruptcy estate, the trust will distribute 88% of the litigation’s net proceeds to the US, certain state governments, the Navajo Nation, and environmental trusts created to clean up the contaminated sites. The 2011 agreement specifies percentages of the funding that will be made available to each site.

DOJ said as a result of these agreements, some of the key recoveries for environmental claims and for waste site cleanups will include an estimated:

• $1.1 billion to be paid to a trust charged with cleaning up two dozen contaminated sites around the country, including the Kerr-McGee Superfund Site in Columbus, Miss.

• $1.1 billion to be paid to a trust responsible for cleaning up a former chemical manufacturing site in Nevada that has led to contamination of Lake Mead.

• $985 million to be paid to EPA for clean-up of 50 abandoned uranium mines in and around the Navajo Nation, where radioactive waste remains from Kerr-McGee mining operations. The Navajo tribe also will receive more than $43 million to address radioactive waste left at the former Kerr-McGee uranium mill in Shiprock, NM, DOJ said.

• $224 million to be paid to EPA for clean-up of thorium contamination at the Welsbach Superfund Site in Gloucester, NJ.

• $217 million to be paid to the federal Superfund in repayment of costs previously incurred by EPA’s clean-up of the Federal Creosote Superfund Site in Manville, NJ.

Additional amounts will be paid to the US government, state governments, Navajo Nation, and environmental trusts for other environmental claims and contaminated sites, DOJ said.

Anadarko said in exchange for the payment, the litigation trust and Kerr-McGee have agreed to mutually release claims against each other, and the US government and Kerr-McGee have provided mutual covenants not to sue. The federal government also will provide contribution protection from third-party claims seeking reimbursement from Kerr-McGee at more than 4,000 sites covered by the covenants, it added.

The claims asserted in the Tronox adversary proceeding will be dismissed with prejudice after the settlement payment is made, Anadarko said. It expects the process to be completed before the end of 2014’s third quarter, and believes its significant cash position and available $5 billion credit facility provide flexibility in funding the settlement payment.

Anadarko said it expects the settlement agreement’s impact to be reflected in its financial results for 2014’s first quarter. It estimated it would record a gross tax benefit of $1.65 billion associated with the settlement, offset by $1.10 billion in uncertain tax positions, which would result in an $550 million net tax benefit.

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com.

Related Articles

Shell cuts $15 billion in spending for 2015-17

01/30/2015 Royal Dutch Shell PLC has curtailed more than $15 billion in potential spending over the next 3 years, but is not “not overreacting to current low ...

Victoria extends drilling, fracing ban

01/30/2015 The new Victorian Labor government of premier Daniel Andrews has extended the coal seam gas (CSG) exploration and hydraulic fracturing ban in the s...

Chevron’s $35 billion capital budget down 13% from last year

01/30/2015 Chevron Corp. will allocate $35 billion in its capital and exploratory investment program for 2015, including $4 billion of planned expenditures by...

US Senate passes bill approving Keystone XL pipeline project

01/30/2015 The US Senate has passed a bill approving construction of the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pipeline by a 62-36 vote after 3 weeks of debate. Nine...

Oxy cuts capital budget by a third

01/30/2015 In the midst of falling oil prices, Occidental Petroleum Corp., Houston, expects to reduce its total capital spending for 2015 to $5.8 billion from...

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX natural gas prices drop after storage report

01/30/2015 US natural gas closed at its lowest price in more than 2 years on the New York market Jan. 29 following the government’s weekly gas storage report,...

Pennsylvania governor reinstates state forest drilling moratorium

01/29/2015 Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) signed an executive order fully reinstating a 2010 moratorium on new oil and gas leases in state forests and parks. ...

PwC: Low oil prices might drive surge in restructuring in 2015

01/29/2015 Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the oil and gas industry hit 10-year highs in terms of deal value and volume in 2014, according to a report f...

DOE could meet 45-day LNG export decision deadline, Senate panel told

01/29/2015 The US Department of Energy would have no trouble meeting a 45-day deadline to reach a national interest determination for proposed LNG export faci...
White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by
Available Webcasts

On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.

register:WEBCAST


Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected