EPA finalizes Tier 3 motor fuel, other requirements

The US Environmental Protection Agency issued final Tier 3 emissions control requirements for motor fuels and vehicles to meet by Jan. 1, 2017. The regulations address one major concern from refiners by keeping sulfur limits per gallon at existing levels, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy said.

“Frankly, what [the American Petroleum Institute] and others were relying on was an outdated estimate based on what they thought we’d propose, not what we actually proposed let alone what we actually put in the regulation following public hearings and extensive public comments,” McCarthy said during a Mar. 4 teleconference.

“The per gallon sulfur cap will remain at existing levels,” McCarthy stated, adding, “I think folks need to take a close look at what we’ve actually done.”

The regulations include provisions to help refiners meet the requirement to reduce gasoline sulfur levels to 10 ppm from 30 ppm by 2017, she continued. “We listened very closely to small refiners and delayed the start date for 30 of them until 2020 because it’s important for them to be able to keep operating and supplying products for their customers,” she told reporters.

Other provisions include:

• A credit averaging, banking, and trading (ABT) program that will allow refiners to spread out their investments from 2014 through 2019 and provide for a seamless transition from the Tier 2 ABT program to the Tier 3 ABT program, including the ability to carry over “banked” credits from Tier 2.

• A 1-year deficit carry-forward provision that allows an individual refinery that does not meet the 10 ppm standard in a given year to carry a deficit forward for 1 year if necessary, as long as it makes up the deficit the following year.

• Hardship provisions which allow refiners to petition for compliance assistance on the basis of extreme hardship or extreme unforeseen circumstances.

The regulations also certified gasoline with a 10% ethanol blend and fuel that is 85% ethanol as test fuels under the program, providing additional certainty for refiners and automakers, McCarthy said.

She said EPA was doing more than standing by its estimate that Tier 3 requirements would add 1¢/gal to the cost of gasoline by 2025: It was reducing it.

“Based on additional research and comments, we estimate this will increase costs for gasoline by about 0.65¢/gal and for new cars and light-duty trucks by about $72/vehicle by 2025,” she said. “In 2017, when this fuel is available, cars will be cleaner. It will provide an opportunity for automakers to use more efficient catalytic converters. The costs won’t be immediate, but gradually ramp up.”

The requirements also potentially will affect natural gas liquids plants, NGL and refined petroleum products pipelines, gasoline additive manufacturers, petroleum bulk stations and terminals, ethyl alcohol and denaturant manufacturers, and other basic chemical manufacturing and wholesaling operations.

Reiterate concerns

API and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers officials reiterated concerns that the new requirements would be costly and unnecessary.

“This rule’s biggest impact is to increase the cost of delivering energy to Americans, making it a threat to consumers, jobs, and the economy,” API Downstream Group Director Bob Greco said on Mar 3. “But it will provide negligible, if any, environmental benefits. In fact, air quality would continue to improve with the existing standard and without additional costs.”

Greco said a study conducted by consulting firm Baker & O’Brien for API determined the new rule could require $10 billion in capital costs and $2.4 billion/year in compliance expenses, equating to a potential 6-9¢/gal increase in the cost of gasoline production. Another study that Environ did for API found the new rule would produce negligible environmental benefits, Greco said.

“We’re also concerned about the timeline of EPA’s new rule,” he added. “The rushed timeframe leaves little opportunity for refiners to design, engineer, permit, construct, start up, and integrate the new machinery required. This accelerated implementation only adds costs and potentially limits our industry’s ability to supply gasoline to consumers.”

AFPM Pres. Charles T. Drevna said EPA’s decision to issue the final Tier 3 rule “is yet the most recent example of the agency’s propensity for illogical and counterproductive rulemaking. Tier 3 not only lacks scientific justification, but in fact will lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions due to the greater energy-intense refining process required to reduce sulfur in gasoline from 30 to 10 ppm.”

He said AFPM was pleased with EPA’s decision to make E10, instead of E15 as was originally proposed, the certified Tier 3 test fuel. “Unlike E10, which constitutes more than 95% of all gasoline sold, E15 is not widely available in the market and is damaging to the majority of vehicles on the road today,” Drevna said on Mar 3. “EPA’s decision is the right choice because there is no market for E15 for one reason: Consumers don’t want the fuel.”

Ignored problems

He said AFPM met with numerous administration officials to outline problems with the proposed standards’ potential impacts and compliance schedule that EPA chose to ignore. “Tier 3 will provide little, if any, benefit, while increasing fuel manufacturing costs on the backs of American consumers,” Drevna said. “Like the Renewable Fuel Standard, [it] not only adds to uncertainty in the market and to potential supply problems, but actually increases greenhouse gas emissions.”

But McCarthy and others who participated in the teleconference said the new regulations provide the most economic and immediate air pollution reductions possible.

“EPA effectively has harmonized the state and federal agencies’ emissions requirements, which allows us to build and calibrate vehicles on a national basis,” said Mike Robinson, vice-president for sustainability and global regulatory affairs at General Motors. “We support lower sulfur emissions requirements for fuels because this is one of the easiest ways to reduce emissions.”

Hundreds of state and local air pollution regulators welcome the new requirements, according to George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., co-president of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies and director of the Air and Radiation Management Administration in Maryland’s Department of the Environment. “We know of no other strategy that can clean the air as cost-effectively as Tier 3,” he maintained.

The new requirements will achieve the equivalent of taking 33 million cars off the road in their first year, Aburn continued. “I can say we’ll never achieve air quality attainment standards without the Tier 3 program,” he said, adding, “It will reduce emissions within the necessary time frames at a reasonable cost. It’s particularly important because the federal government is best equipped to tackle mobile source emissions.”

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com

Related Articles

Obama’s proposed fiscal 2016 budget recycles oil tax increases

02/02/2015 US President Barack Obama has proposed his federal budget for fiscal 2016 that he said was designed to help a beleaguered middle class take advanta...

MOL absorbs Eni’s Romanian retail assets

02/02/2015

MOL Group, Budapest, has completed the acquisition of Eni Romania, including 42 service stations to be rebranded under the MOL name.

CNOOC subsidiary inks deal for grassroots refinery

02/02/2015 Hebei Zhongjie Petrochemical Group Co. Ltd., a subsidiary of China National Offshore Oil Corp. (CNOOC), has entered into a $700 million agreement w...

Pessimism mounts over UK offshore industry

02/02/2015

Pessimism about the UK offshore oil and gas industry is gaining momentum.

EnLink agrees to purchase Coronado Midstream for $600 million

02/02/2015 EnLink Midstream has agreed to acquire Coronado Midstream Holdings LLC, which owns natural gas gathering and processing facilities in the Permian b...

Antero trimming, delaying Marcellus drilling

02/02/2015 Antero Resources Corp., Denver, has announced a $1.8 billion budget for 2015, which is down 41% from 2014. The independent said it plans to defer c...

Woodside gets NEB approval for British Columbia LNG exports

02/02/2015 Woodside Energy Holdings Pty. Ltd. has received approval from Canada’s National Energy Board on its application for a 25-year natural gas export li...

Syncrude sees additional $260-400 million in possible budget cuts

02/02/2015 The estimate for capital expenditures has also been reduced to $451 million net to COS, which includes $104 million of remaining expenditures on ma...

Kerry expects to receive other agencies’ Keystone XL reports soon

02/02/2015 US Sec. of State John F. Kerry said he expects to receive other federal agencies and departments’ reports soon on the proposed Keystone XL crude oi...
White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by
Available Webcasts

On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.

register:WEBCAST


Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected