Bill aims to protect states' shares of federal royalties

US Rep. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) introduced legislation to ensure states that normally receive half of federal onshore oil and gas royalties under the Mineral Leasing Act actually receive the money.

MLA mandates that the federal government pay states where the federal government controls most of the land 50% of any revenue it collects from mineral leases there to offset taxes which otherwise would have gone to the state and county.

Lummis, who co-chairs the House Western Caucus, and other federal lawmakers from the Rocky Mountains say the federal government diverted nearly $110 million of revenue their states should have received to offset sequestration impacts. “This spring, my home state of Wyoming saw $53 million in royalty funds disappear right before their eyes,” she said on May 14 as she introduced her bill.

Her State Mineral Revenue Protection Act would amend the MLA to grant states the option to collect their share of the mineral royalties, and grant those states full property interest in their share. Participation in the program would be voluntary, and states could still continue to participate in the current federal royalty distribution system.

Operators in states that choose to collect their part of a federal royalty would pay the state share directly to the state, and also pay the federal government its 50% share. The royalty rate itself would not increase under the bill.

“It is becoming more and more apparent that when the federal government is a middle man for funds owed to the state, the middle man cannot be trusted to make the payments,” Lummis said. “The solution? Remove the middle man. States are fully capable of collecting these royalty payments, and states are much better off if their share of the revenue never leaves the states’ borders.”

US Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) introduced similar legislation in the Senate. “It sets a dangerous precedent when Washington thinks it’s ok to take state money instead of cutting its own spending,” he said. “The government needs to uphold its end of the deal.”

The Energy Producing States Coalition, a group of state legislators founded in 2011 to work together to develop areas of common interest on policies and issues that affect domestic energy production and transmission, applauded both bills.

“EPSC believes that withholding state mineral revenue payments under any circumstance is inappropriate and supports congressional actions to eliminate the possibility of any future occurrences,” it said on May 14. “EPSC encourages their entire congressional delegations to support this important legislation.”

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com.

Related Articles

Bakken field production reaches 1 billion bbl mark

04/28/2014 Citing data from IHS, Continental Resources Inc. reported that Bakken field has surpassed 1 billion bbl of cumulative light, sweet crude oil produc...

EPA cuts 2013 cellulosic-ethanol mandate

04/28/2014 The US Environmental Protection Agency lowered the amount of cellulosic ethanol required in 2013 to the amount actually produced, relieving refiner...

BG Group chief executive resigns

04/28/2014 BG Group’s board has accepted Chris Finlayson’s resignation as chief executive and executive director, effectively immediately. Andrew Gould, BG no...

MARKET WATCH: Crude futures price ends week above $100/bbl

04/28/2014 The New York Mercantile Exchange June crude oil contract price lost 1.34¢, closing at $100.60/bbl on Apr. 25. The July contract relinquished $1.32 ...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected