LNG export strategy should be balanced, expert tells House panel

The US should adopt an LNG export strategy that provides certainty for producers but doesn’t significantly increase prices for industries and other consumers, an expert told the US House Oversight and Investigations Committee.

“For starters, I disagree with the two most extreme proposals of a volumetric cap, or a policy where the US automatically approves all applications,” said Charles K. Ebinger, foreign policy director of the Brookings Institution’s Energy Security Initiative. “Both are treacherous to implement and may increase, rather than decrease, uncertainty.”

A policy that does not increase export costs, but does reflect the cost of constructing a facility at the beginning of the application would provide the necessary balance, Ebinger suggested.

It would require an applicant to successfully complete the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s prefiling process and have a portion of its supply contracts signed before being eligible to be considered by the US Department of Energy for an application to export LNG to countries which do not have a free trade agreement with the US, Ebinger said.

“Both requirements are costly and will encourage only serious projects to move forward,” he noted.

Defining ‘public interest’

Ebinger said more clarity should be brought to the public interest determination DOE is asked to reach in such applications, which currently is too vague and creates investment uncertainty.

“One possibility is to allow the ‘public interest’ to be dependent on the aforementioned two stipulations,” he said. “In other words, if a company completes its prefiling process and contracts out a given percentage of its capacity, the exports are deemed to be in the public interest.”

Finally, US gas export policies should be audited every 5 years, Ebinger said. “Such an audit would identify what happened to domestic gas supply, demand, and prices, and international markets during each 5-year period,” he said.

The Industrial Energy Consumers of America (IECA) would like DOE to complete a study analyzing LNG export implications as well as develop appropriate public interest determination guidelines through a formal rulemaking process, IECA Pres. Paul N. Cicio testified.

“The outstanding authorization requests present what is essentially a new challenge,” Cicio said. “In the modern era, the US government has not faced the need to determine the public interest in connection with requests to authorize exports of large volumes of natural gas.

He said, “Congress should encourage DOE to continue its effort to improve the process for evaluating LNG export applications by providing an opportunity for all affected constituencies and the public at large to comment on how best to assess the public interest as it pertains to [LNG] exports.”

Export economics

Global markets will determine whether US LNG exports are economically viable, according to Tom Choi, who leads the Natural Gas Practice at Deloitte MarketPoint LLC. “Just because US markets are connected to import markets does not mean that US prices will rise to the level of importing countries,” he told the committee.

The cost of LNG liquefaction, shipping, and regasification provides a large price wedge between US and import markets, Choi said. “Or stated differently, the price of gas in foreign markets needs to be about twice the current US price in order for LNG exports to be economically viable,” he said.

“Exports will only occur if wide price spreads persist, implying that sectors of the US economy that compete in global markets will not likely see their gas price advantage significantly diminish as a result of LNG exports,” Choi testified. “If large price spreads between markets begin to narrow, the economic quantity of US LNG exported would likely be reduced.”

Christopher A. Smith, acting assistant secretary for fossil energy at DOE, said that as of Mar. 7, DOE has approved one long-term application to export LNG from the Lower 48 to a non-FTA country. Cheniere Energy Partners LLC’s Sabine Liquefaction LLC was cleared to export LNG equal to 2.2 bcfd from the proposed Cameron Parish, La., facility.

Nineteen more applications to export another 26.1 bcfd to non-FTA countries are pending, he added. “Now that all comments have been received regarding the LNG Export Study from the comment period that ended Feb. 25, the department will take into consideration the study, the comments, and the record of the proceedings the 19 non-FTA LNG export applications,” Smith said. “[It] will then make a public interest determination and act on pending applications on a case-by-case basis.”

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com.

Related Articles

Oil, gas infrastructure investments essential, House panel told

02/04/2015 Investments in oil and gas transportation and storage should move ahead because they are essential in continuing the US economic recovery and North...

Petrobras CEO, five other senior executives resign

02/04/2015 Maria das Gracas Foster, chief executive officer of Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) since 2012, has resigned along with five other senior execut...

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil prices reach 2015 high

02/04/2015 Crude oil prices surged more than $3/bbl on the New York market Feb. 3, closing at the highest level so far this year, but some analysts believe th...

Chevron unit farms into Mauritania offshore blocks

02/04/2015 Chevron Mauritania Exploration Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corp., has agreed to acquire 30% nonoperated working interest in Blocks C...

Saetre named Statoil president, CEO

02/04/2015

Eldar Saetre has been named president and chief executive officer of Statoil, succeeding Helge Lund, who resigned in October.

BG’s 2015 budget ‘significantly lower than 2014’

02/03/2015 BG Group plans capital expenditures on a cash basis of $6-7 billion in 2015, a range it says is “significantly lower than 2014” due to “a lower oil...

BP trims capital budget by $4-6 billion

02/03/2015 BP PLC plans an organic capital expenditure of $20 billion in 2015, down from the previous guidance $24-26 billion. Total organic capital expenditu...

EPA suggests DOS reconsider Keystone XL climate impact conclusions

02/03/2015 The US Department of State might want to reconsider its conclusions regarding potential climate impacts from the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pip...

IHS sees second-half end of US output surge

02/03/2015

Expectations are moderating about growth of oil production in the US this year.

White Papers

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...
Available Webcasts


Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected