BPC lists objectives for maintaining the US energy resurgence

The US should pursue a diverse energy portfolio, improve the economy’s economic productivity, accelerate innovation and technology improvements across the energy sector, and improve energy policy governance and accountability, the Bipartisan Policy Center said in a new report.

“This report is proof that people with strong differences can develop a consensus plan to advance national energy policy,” said BPC Pres. Jason S. Grumet. “While Congress is not in a particularly collaborative mood, energy policy has often been a source of bipartisan agreement.”

Grumet said, “Recent achievements in production, efficiency, and advanced technologies create an opportunity for Congress to legislate from a position of national strength.” The detailed recommendations “are designed to provide impetus for a serious legislative effort,” he said.

“We should take advantage of the unbelievable resurgence of the oil and gas industry in this country,” suggested former US Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-ND), co-chairman with former US Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) of BPC’s Strategic Energy Policy Initiative.

Dorgan noted that 5 years ago, while serving on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, he asked the US Geological Survey to complete its research on the crude oil potential of the Bakken shale in North Dakota and Montana, and held a press conference about it with the US Department of the Interior agency.

‘Only the beginning’

“Everyone knows what has happened since, and it was only the beginning of a broader domestic oil and gas revival,” Dorgan said. “But we also need to pursue alternatives and continue making impressive gains in efficiency.”

Lorr added, “I think we’ve produced a product that will be useful to everyone who’s interested in energy, but we’re not going to stop here. We plan to discuss this with the media and meet with members of Congress.”

He also urged the Senate’s current leadership—Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and Ranking Minority Member Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)—to concentrate more on energy bills that could significantly improve the national economic recovery “and quit picking fights over issues where there’s no chance for agreement.” He said, “The idea is to produce something that would be good for the country. It starts by taking one good step, and then moving on to the next one.”

Some of the more than 50 recommendations under the four broad objectives involve oil and gas more directly than others. Under pursuit of a diverse energy portfolio, for example, the first recommendation is to expand production of domestic oil and gas resources while improving the environmental performance of shale oil and gas development.

Others call for more research, development, and deployment of power generation and transportation fuel alternatives, carbon capture and storage technologies, and an improved nuclear power structure.

Two more already have strong oil and gas industry support: evaluating training needs for a skilled energy workforce, and avoiding international energy trade restrictions such as calls to limit liquefied natural gas exports.

Tax provision review

The final recommendation under this objective—“reviewing the full range of energy tax expenditures and developing a reasonable phase-out plan for those…that constitute subsides for mature fuels and technologies”—is already controversial. The Obama administration has said that several federal tax provisions, which the oil and gas industry considers essential to recover ongoing necessary business expenses, are actually subsidies which have outlived their purpose.

Possibly the report’s harshest critique is its assessment of federal energy policymaking. “The executive branch is not well-equipped to develop, coordinate, and implement national energy policy,” its summary said. “Energy-related responsibilities fall under at least 20 distinct federal agencies and departments. This has increased the potential for failure in coordination, incompatible agendas, duplication, and inconsistency across the federal complex.”

Retired US Marine Corps Gen. James M. Jones, who chairs BPC’s Energy Policy group, said, “We have not produced a coherent US energy policy in 50 years. This report offers suggestions for one. Implementing them will require strong leadership to reconcile more oil and gas production, better environmental management, pursuit of alternative and renewable energy technologies, and implementation of a good trade policy.”

The report recommends establishing a National Energy Security Council to develop a high-level national energy strategy and review it every four years. It would be paired with a well-coordinated implementation plan which could respond to often unpredictable economic, political, and technological conditions, and regularly track and report progress.

Energy secretary’s role

“I think if we’re going to reach our potential, we need to be better organized,” said Jones. “For example, the US energy secretary needs to be designated the single point of contact, as our report suggests.”

Lott said, “Our governance recommendations could be accomplished to a great extent by the president. Congress might also need to be involved on some aspects of it.” He noted that Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Ranking Minority Member Lisa Murkowski’s (R-Alas.) 20/20 plan includes an advanced energy trust fund. “My immediate question is where we’d get the revenue to fund that,” he said.

Former US Environmental Protection Agency Administrator William K. Reilly, who chairs BPC’s Energy and Environment committee, said the Chinese probably better recognize the significance of the US oil and gas renaissance than most Americans.

“But there’s one other aspect that’s more of a sleeper,” he continued. “Efficiency has contributed more at the energy source than coal, oil, gas, nuclear and renewables combined. The number of coal-fired power plants which have been avoided as a result of these energy productivity gains numbers in the hundreds.

Further energy efficiency improvements represent a very large opportunity, he maintained. “The National Academy of Sciences estimates that in the next 100 years, it will be possible to undertake all the building this country needs without materially increasing its energy consumption,” Reilly said. “That is a profoundly tantalizing and inviting possibility, and it does not involve dramatic technology breakthroughs.”

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com.

Related Articles

Deloitte studies oil supply growth for 2015-16

02/04/2015 A Deloitte MarketPoint analysis suggested large-field projects, each producing more than 25,000 b/d, could bring on 1.835 million b/d in oil supply...

Oil, gas infrastructure investments essential, House panel told

02/04/2015 Investments in oil and gas transportation and storage should move ahead because they are essential in continuing the US economic recovery and North...

Petrobras CEO, five other senior executives resign

02/04/2015 Maria das Gracas Foster, chief executive officer of Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobras) since 2012, has resigned along with five other senior execut...

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil prices reach 2015 high

02/04/2015 Crude oil prices surged more than $3/bbl on the New York market Feb. 3, closing at the highest level so far this year, but some analysts believe th...

Chevron unit farms into Mauritania offshore blocks

02/04/2015 Chevron Mauritania Exploration Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corp., has agreed to acquire 30% nonoperated working interest in Blocks C...

Saetre named Statoil president, CEO

02/04/2015

Eldar Saetre has been named president and chief executive officer of Statoil, succeeding Helge Lund, who resigned in October.

BG’s 2015 budget ‘significantly lower than 2014’

02/03/2015 BG Group plans capital expenditures on a cash basis of $6-7 billion in 2015, a range it says is “significantly lower than 2014” due to “a lower oil...

BP trims capital budget by $4-6 billion

02/03/2015 BP PLC plans an organic capital expenditure of $20 billion in 2015, down from the previous guidance $24-26 billion. Total organic capital expenditu...

EPA suggests DOS reconsider Keystone XL climate impact conclusions

02/03/2015 The US Department of State might want to reconsider its conclusions regarding potential climate impacts from the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pip...
White Papers

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...
Available Webcasts


Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected