API: USGS did better job testing Pavillion water than EPA

Analysis of US Geological Survey testing of water samples taken from one of two US Environmental Protection Agency monitoring wells at Pavillion, Wyo., raises questions about the how EPA constructed monitoring wells and tested water samples, an American Petroleum Institute spokesman said.

Some Pavillion residents complained about drinking water, suggesting natural gas drilling and hydraulic fracturing contaminated certain water wells. In December 2011, EPA said it was “likely” that fracing contributed to water contamination based upon results from EPA’s two deep monitoring wells.

EPA released its conclusion in a draft report that identified levels of methane, ethane, diesel compounds, and phenol. Later, EPA retested the water in the Pavillion area.

Erik Milito, API director of upstream, told reporters in an Oct. 18 conference call that it appears EPA failed to follow sound scientific practices at Pavillion. Consequently, the idea of flawed research raises concerns about EPA’s pending national study on fracing and drinking water sources, he said.

“Unscientific testing could produce flawed results that could result in major adverse impacts on shale energy development and the vast potential it has to contribute to US jobs, US economic recovery, and US energy security,” Milito said.

USGS results were inconsistent with EPA’s results, he said. Given questions about EPA’s research, USGS collected its own scientific findings as part of a collaboration among the state of Wyoming, USGS, EPA, and the Wyoming Tribes. USGS did not analyze its findings (OGJ Online, Sept. 27, 2012).

Encana Oil & Gas (USA) owns wells in the area and questions the source of some chemicals found in the EPA water well samples (OGJ Online, Jan. 2, 2012).

The Calgary oil company argues contaminants found in Pavillion water wells are naturally occurring, and the two test wells that the EPA drilled in 2010 were improperly constructed.

API questions EPA

Milito said API believes USGS did a better job than EPA in analyzing the Pavillion water samples. For instance, USGS did not test samples from one of the two EPA water monitoring wells “because that well was unable to provide representative samples due to its low-flow characteristics.”

USGS tests did not contain several key compounds previously identified by EPA, he said. Those compounds included glycols and 2-butoxyethanol. Other materials previously found by the EPA were found at significantly lower concentrations by the USGS.

“In addition, while EPA has yet to acknowledge this, hydrocarbons are naturally occurring and have historically been detected in groundwater in the Pavillion area,” Milito said. “It is not unexpected to find hydrocarbons in groundwater in a hydrocarbon-bearing formation.”

He called the Pavillion analysis “critically important” because EPA needs to “start from scratch” in its procedures to drill water monitoring wells, collect, and analyze samples.

API believes EPA’s flaws include improper water monitoring well construction and development, possible cross-contamination of groundwater during EPA’s monitoring well drilling, development, and sampling, and misrepresentation of monitoring well depths vs. area drinking water well depths.

“If EPA thinks its investigation at Pavillion has produced scientifically useful information, then it may proceed in the same inexpert way at other testing sites,” Milito said, urging the federal government to avoid “regulatory obstacles based on flawed research.”

Others support EPA

The Sierra Club, Earthworks, and the Natural Resources Defense Council worked with independent hydrologist Tom Myers to analyze the USGS findings and compare those findings with the original EPA report. Myers concluded USGS results supported EPA’s initial findings.

In an Oct. 3 news release, the Sierra Club, Earthworks, and NRC said Myer's analysis of USGS findings supported the EPA’s draft report conclusion that gas drilling and fracing could have contaminated the Wind River aquifer near Pavillion.

Bruce Baizel, an attorney for Earthworks oil and gas accountability project, said, “It’s long past time for states and industry to stop denying oil and gas development’s environmental problems and start working on fixing them.”

Deb Nardone, Sierra Club Beyond Natural Gas campaign director, said EPA’s report “raises the alarm on the public general health threats posed by dirty and dangerous fracing and the need to rein in an oil and gas industry that remains unchecked and unaccountable for their toxic pollution.”

Contact Paula Dittrick at paulad@ogjonline.com.

Related Articles

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil prices reach 2015 high

02/04/2015 Crude oil prices surged more than $3/bbl on the New York market Feb. 3, closing at the highest level so far this year, but some analysts believe th...

Chevron unit farms into Mauritania offshore blocks

02/04/2015 Chevron Mauritania Exploration Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chevron Corp., has agreed to acquire 30% nonoperated working interest in Blocks C...

Saetre named Statoil president, CEO

02/04/2015

Eldar Saetre has been named president and chief executive officer of Statoil, succeeding Helge Lund, who resigned in October.

BG’s 2015 budget ‘significantly lower than 2014’

02/03/2015 BG Group plans capital expenditures on a cash basis of $6-7 billion in 2015, a range it says is “significantly lower than 2014” due to “a lower oil...

BP trims capital budget by $4-6 billion

02/03/2015 BP PLC plans an organic capital expenditure of $20 billion in 2015, down from the previous guidance $24-26 billion. Total organic capital expenditu...

EPA suggests DOS reconsider Keystone XL climate impact conclusions

02/03/2015 The US Department of State might want to reconsider its conclusions regarding potential climate impacts from the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pip...

IHS sees second-half end of US output surge

02/03/2015

Expectations are moderating about growth of oil production in the US this year.

Anadarko reports 2014 loss, remains upbeat about Wattenberg

02/03/2015 Anadarko Petroleum Corp. announced a 2014 net loss of $1.75 billion, or $3.47/share diluted, including a net loss of $4.05 billion associated with ...

CNOOC cuts capital budget, starts production from Jinzhou 9-3

02/03/2015 CNOOC Ltd. is slashing its capital budget for 2015 by 26-35% to $11.25-12.86 billion compared with last year’s budget. Capital expenditures for exp...

White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by

Available Webcasts



Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realties

When Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

When Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected