Senate GOP bill prods Obama to reverse Keystone XL delay

US Senate Republicans introduced legislation that would deem the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pipeline federally approved 60 days after enactment if the Obama administration did not act. But several said they would rather see US President Barack Obama reverse his Nov. 11 decision to delay acting on TransCanada Inc.’s cross-border permit application for the project until after the 2012 elections.

“Our foreign oil vulnerability endangers our national security,” said Richard D. Lugar (Ind.), the bill’s main sponsor, at a Nov. 30 press conference. “Building the TransCanada Keystone XL pipeline now is a dramatic opportunity to change that equation. It’s also a dramatic opportunity to create jobs. It’s the largest infrastructure project ready now in the United States.” He said that he would push for immediate consideration by the Foreign Relations Committee, where he is ranking minority member.

Mike Johanns (Neb.), one of the bill’s 37 cosponsors, said issues surrounding Keystone XL’s route across his state have been resolved, and the bill reflects this. “If the president were to act on this today, work could commence,” he maintained. “Even though we are working on this legislation and hope that it will pass, our message to the president today is if he really wants to create jobs and provide more energy independence for this country, approve the permits.”

“This delay is bad energy policy. It’s politics, plain and simple,” observed Lisa Murkowski (Alas.), the Energy and Natural Resources Committee’s ranking minority member and one of the bill’s 37 cosponsors. “For the nearly 20,000 people who held out hope they might be working on this project, they’re disappointed that they’re going to have to wait.”

Other cosponsors noted that forcing Canadian oil sands producers to sell crude recovered from Alberta deposits elsewhere would have greater adverse environmental impacts. John Hoeven (SD), another Energy and Natural Resources Committee member, said supertankers and terminals involved in transporting the crude from Canada’s west coast to East Asian customers would emit more carbon dioxide than the proposed 1,700 mile pipeline. “Right now, there also are 100,000 b/d of light sweet crude being produced in North Dakota and eastern Montana that could go into this pipeline,” he added.

The American Petroleum Institute immediately expressed its strong support for the bill. “It would enable the permitting process to proceed while efforts continue to resolve concerns related to one isolated area in Nebraska,” said API Executive Vice-Pres. Marty Durbin. “The process has dragged on for more than 3 years and the latest decision by the president will add at least another year of delay. This shovel-ready project should not be shelved for political purposes.”

Contact Nick Snow at

Related Articles

Cenovus gets AER approval for Grand Rapids oil sands project

03/21/2014 Cenovus Energy Inc. reported that it has received approval from the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) for its wholly owned Grand Rapids thermal oil sa...

Ivanhoe halts Tamarack oil sands project citing lack of regulatory ‘clarity’

03/18/2014 Ivanhoe Energy Inc. has suspended activity on its Tamarack oil sands project pending approval for its thermal oil sands application from the govern...

CAPP: Emissions monitoring Continues in Alberta oil sands

03/10/2014 Alberta's oil sands producers have monitored emissions for potential public health impacts with the province's government for a while, the Canadian...

Keystone XL national interest comments deadline approaches

03/06/2014 Groups on both sides said support has grown for their positions as the US Department of State’s Mar. 7 deadline approached for comments on whether ...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!


Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected