'Subsidy' tax ploy hurts credibility of politicos pushing it

Bob Tippee
Editor

Effective democratic governance depends on the quality of discourse, which plunges when elected officials jettison truth to pursue political aims.

Exploiting anger over high gasoline prices—about which no one can do anything except use less gasoline and wait—many elected officials want to raise taxes on oil and gas companies under the pretense of ending subsidies. There, they traffic in falsehood.

“Do these very profitable companies actually need taxpayer subsidies?” asked Max Baucus (D-Mont.), chairman of the Finance Committee, during the latest grilling on Capitol Hill of top executives of major oil companies.

In fact, these companies don’t need subsidies. More to the point: They don’t have any.

What they have are accounting deductions equivalent to those of companies in other industries, some with special names and modes of application to reflect the peculiarities of extractive industries.

Those deductions aren’t subsidies. Calling them that is a propaganda trick employed by too many politicos, starting with President Barack Obama.

In tax accounting, all businesses deduct normal expenses from gross revenue in calculations of income subject to taxation.

Yet Democrats in Congress and the Executive Branch repeatedly misrepresent deductions used by oil and gas companies as subsidies inappropriate in a period of high oil prices and monster deficits. Then they bluster about ending them.

They also want to deny oil and gas companies the use of a deduction generally available to US manufacturers and to remove a credit for taxes paid to foreign governments.

All because large companies that produce oil are—unsurprisingly—reporting large profits while oil prices are high.

“I don’t think you have any idea what the size of your profits does to their [members of the public] ability to accept what you say,” John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) told the oil company executives.

Nonsense. Big profits by big companies in a big industry have nothing to do with credibility.

The same can’t be said for deliberate deception about an arcane subject, promulgated for political advantage.

(Online May 13, 2011; author’s e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

ExxonMobil ‘winding down’ Arctic well, complying with US, EU sanctions on Russia

09/19/2014 ExxonMobil Corp. released a statement that the company is complying with all US sanctions on Russia after news reports that the operator had halted...

GMU forum: More energy cases could head to Supreme Court in 2015

09/18/2014 The US Environmental Protection Agency’s ambitious regulatory agenda potentially could push more energy cases to the US Supreme Court in 2015, spea...

Senate adopts bill making BLM drilling permit pilot program permanent

09/17/2014 The US Senate approved Tom Udall (D-NM) and John Barrasso’s (R-Wyo.) bill permanently extending a US Bureau of Land Management drilling permit proc...

Senators offer bill to reform energy project cross-border permitting

09/16/2014 Four US senators—2 Democrats and 2 Republicans—introduced legislation to prevent extended delays of energy projects requiring a cross-border permit...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected