Waxman-Markey bill would add $846 billion in taxes, CBO says

A US House bill which would introduce a domestic cap-and-trade program to begin controlling global carbon emissions would cost $846 billion in new taxes, the Congressional Budget Office said on June 5.

 

The bill’s net contribution to the federal budget would be about $24 billion because it also would increase direct federal spending by $821 billion, CBO said in its analysis of HR 2454, the 2009 American Clean Energy and Security which the House Energy and Commerce Committee approved on May 21 by 33 to 25 votes.

 

“In addition, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts, CBO estimates that implementing HR 2454 would increase discretionary spending by about $50 billion over the 2010-19 period,” it indicated. “Most of that funding would stem from spending auction proceeds for various funds  authorized under this legislation.”

 

It also said that mandates under the bill would exceed thresholds under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act by $139 million for private sector entities and $69 million for intergovernmental outlays in 2009.

 

CBO’s study confirmed that the bill, cosponsored by Reps. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), chairman of the committee’s Energy and Environment Subcommittee, would be “massively costly,” American Petroleum Institute President Jack N. Gerard said on June 8.

 

“The $846 billion price tag on emission allowances, borne disproportionately by oil consumers, will drive up costs of producing and refining gasoline, diesel and other fuel products while doing nothing to protect fuel consumers, including American families, trucking, the airlines, the construction industry, and many other businesses that rely on oil to make or transport products,” he said in a statement.

 

‘A job-killer’

 

Gerard said that based on allowance costs in CBO’s study, impacts could be as much as 77 cents/gal for gasoline, 83 cents/gal for jet fuel, and 88 cents/gal for diesel fuel. “This is what happens when market-based regulation is abandoned in favor of picking winners and losers. Putting most of the burden on one sector also helps explain why this legislation promises to be a job-killer,” he maintained.

 

But Waxman said as he opened a June 9 hearing on the bill’s offsets that it uses more than half of its allowances to protect consumers from higher energy prices with programs for electricity, natural gas, and heating oil users; for low and moderate-income families, and to provide rebates to consumers.

 

HR 2545 also invests in developing and deploying energy efficiency programs and clean energy technology, which will create jobs, he continued. It also provides transition assistance to US industries to assure that they stay globally competitive, he said.

 

“The committee has worked hard on this allocation plan to ensure that it is fair. It does what a good energy bill needs to do: It balances the interest of different parts of the country, and of different stakeholders, and accomplishes much of what is important to everyone. It will go a long way to moving the country into a clean energy future,” Waxman said.

 

But the committee’s ranking minority member, Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.), said in his opening statement that it’s not possible to design an allocation for an economy as complex as that of the United States. “You really can’t make it fair,” he declared.

 

May undermine goal

 

A group of larger US independent producers, meanwhile, warned on June 8 that the bill includes provisions which undermine its goal of reducing greenhouse gases by possibly discouraging natural gas use. “Specifically, the allowance allocation formula in the bill could eliminate the incentive to burn fuels with a lower carbon content for power generation,” said Rod Lowman, president of America’s Natural Gas Alliance, which represents 25 upstream independents producing more than 40% of total US gas supplies annually.

 

HR 2545 would initially distribute for free 50% of its utility allowances based on the utility’s average annual carbon dioxide emissions from retail electricity sales, Lowman continued in a letter to the committee and subcommittee’s chairmen and ranking minority members. This provides a disincentive for utilities to buy their electricity from generators who use gas or other cleaner fuels, he suggested.

 

“We believe allowance allocations should instead reward utilities that acquire their power from fossil fuel generators that have the lowest CO2 emissions per megawatt hour and are also the most efficient (e.g., require the least amount of energy to produce electricity),” said Lowman.

 

“The allocation policy for allowances should complement the bill’s environmental goals, not cancel out the distinction between high and low carbon fossil fuels for generating electricity. Such an approach to us seems counterproductive,” he said.

 

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com

 

Related Articles

Operators cutting methane emissions

02/10/2015 Cuts in methane emissions from oil and gas production ought to be combined with aggressive efforts to curb excessive carbon dioxide releases, produ...

Emissions from liquid unloadings vary by region

02/10/2015 A recent study by the University of Texas at Austin and the environmental testing firm URS indicated that a small percentage of wells account for t...

ND bills would expand Industrial Commission, void flaring rule, vapor-pressure standards

02/10/2015 Republican lawmakers in North Dakota have initiated legislation that would bring already-established rules on reduced gas flaring and on oil condit...

Renewed uncertainty emerges over Greater Sunrise development

02/10/2015 There has been renewed uncertainty over the development of the Woodside Petroleum Ltd.-operated Greater Sunrise gas field in the Timor Sea followin...

Senators’ bill aims to curb flaring by expediting permit process

02/09/2015 North Dakota and Wyoming’s US senators introduced legislation that aims to capture methane and reduce flaring by expediting procedures for obtainin...

Association presidents want more access in next 5-year OCS plan

02/09/2015 The presidents of three major US oil and gas trade associations urged the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to keep more of the US Outer Contine...

After Keystone nod, Congress should okay ANWR leasing

02/09/2015 Now that it has passed legislation supporting the Keystone XL pipeline, Congress should approve oil and gas leasing of the Arctic National Wildlife...

White House proposes making ANWR coastal plain wilderness

02/09/2015 The Obama administration said it will propose managing more of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, including its coastal plain, as wilderness.

Obama's proposed fiscal 2016 budget recycles oil tax increases

02/09/2015 US President Barack Obama has proposed his federal budget for fiscal 2016 that he said was designed to help a beleaguered middle class take advanta...
White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by
Available Webcasts

On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected