FERC issues final EIS for proposed LNG project near Baltimore

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's staff identified additional adverse environmental impacts as it issued a final environmental impact statement on Dec. 5 for a proposed liquefied natural gas project outside Baltimore.

But the staff said that such impacts would be "mostly limited" from the LNG import terminal and associated pipeline. The final EIS's conclusion was similar to one reached in its draft EIS of the project on April 25, which noted that AES Corp. plans to build the terminal within an industrial port setting at Sparrows Point. The facility would be capable of storing up to 480,000 cubic meters of LNG with a baseload send-out rate of 1.5 billion cubic feet per day of revaporized natural gas, FERC said.

Maryland state and local government officials have expressed opposition to the project, saying it would bring LNG tankers up Chesapeake Bay and potentially disrupt Baltimore Harbor vessel traffic. Two members of the state's congressional delegation said on Dec. 5 that they were not satisfied with FERC's final EIS.

US Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.) said on Dec. 5 that the number of recommended mitigation measures grew from 151 in the draft EIS to 179 in the latest document. "I remain firmly opposed to a new LNG facility at Sparrows Point. For over two years, I have repeatedly raised my safety, security and environmental concerns about this LNG facility and pipeline. I am deeply disappointed that FERC continues to rubber stamp a project that our state is adamantly opposed to," she declared.

"This is a tough setback, but I will not give up the fight to stop the proposed LNG facility from coming to eastern Baltimore County. I have said from the very beginning this proposed liquefied natural gas plant is absolutely inappropriate for this residential area," said Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger. The final EIS "ignores the safety of nearby residents who would live in the shadow of the facility," he charged.

More mitigation measures

FERC's staff said in the final EIS that the US Coast Guard's Waterway Suitability Report for the project has "preliminarily determined" that additional recommended mitigation measures would be needed to make the Patapsco River, Chesapeake Bay and territorial seas suitable for LNG marine traffic to the proposed terminal site and responsibly manage marine and safety risks.

"Along the marine transit route, potential impacts, thought short-term, could be significant to boaters and fishermen by interfering with their normal and accustomed practices of using the Chesapeake Bay and Patapsco River," it conceded.

AES would need to coordinate with the Port of Baltimore and with special boating interest groups to minimize disruption of scheduled annual maritime events, the final EIS suggested. "Coordination with the Coast Guard's Marine Event Permit Office would be necessary since events may require LNG vessels to adjust their transit . . . We have also recommended that AES work with the Coast Guard and Patuxent River Naval Air Station during development of its transit management plan," it said.

FERC's final EIS also said that the proposed project's construction would have a temporary impact on about 1,801 acres of land. There are no existing residences within a mile of the planned terminal, but the proposed pipeline would cross within 50 feet of 179 residences and 56 other buildings, it indicated.

Mid-Atlantic Express LLC, an AES division which proposes constructing an 88-mile pipeline from the LNG terminal to Eagle, Pa., has filed site-specific plans for residences within 25 feet of construction, the final EIS said. But FERC's staff found that the plans lacked detail and sufficient mitigation measures, it added. "Pipeline construction could also affect wells and septic systems; therefore, we have recommended that Mid-Atlantic Express file site-specific plans for residences within 50 feet of the pipeline construction work space as well as measures for mitigating impacts to wells, septic systems and other utilities," it said.

Camps, parks and trails

The pipeline's construction also could have adverse impacts on several camps, parks and trails, it continued. "Many of the construction impacts would be temporary; however some scenic watersheds would be permanently impacted," it said.

AES also would be required to develop and implement an emergency response plan which would involve state and local agencies and municipalities, including a cost-sharing plan and a transit management plan, according to the final EIS. The company also would have to meet requirements of FERC, the Coast Guard and other federal agencies, it said.

Ruppersberger said that the Coast Guard issued a report earlier this year which found that AES does not appear to take security seriously and assumes that the Coast Guard will handle all security at taxpayer expense. "In addition, the company . . . wants Maryland taxpayers to foot much of the bill for any security changes that may need to be implemented. This is unfair because the natural gas will be pumped out of state," he said.

FERC's final EIS said that the Coast Guard's Feb. 25 Waterway Suitability Report identifies specific risk mitigation measures which would be needed to responsibly manage maritime safety and security risks. "Accordingly, we have recommended that the proposed facility comply with all requirements set forth by the Coast Guard," it said.

It noted that since the draft EIS was issued in late April, US Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez issued a finding that the project, if approved, would be consistent with the Coastal Zone Management Act, as necessary for the establishment of safety and security zones for LNG traffic in Maryland and Virginia waters.

FERC said that commissioners would consider the staff's recommendations in the final EIS when they make a final decision on the proposed project.

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com

Related Articles

Canada Briefs

12/12/2014

Kinder Morgan to deliver natural gas to Corpus Christi Liquefaction

12/11/2014 Kinder Morgan Inc. (KMI) companies Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline, Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline, and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (TGP) have entered in...

Magnolia LNG lets EPC contract to SK E&C USA

12/03/2014 Magnolia LNG LLC parent-company Liquefied Natural Gas Ltd. agreed to an engineering, procurement, and construction contract with SK E&C USA cov...

Pipeline leak dampens Atlantic LNG production

12/01/2014 Atlantic LNG (ALNG) reported a 35% reduction in LNG production because of insufficient natural gas supply from Trinidad and Tobago’s National Gas C...

Real-time monitoring improves LNG inventory measurement

12/01/2014 Kogas has improved the calculation method for determining stocks at its LNG terminals, changing from a sampling method to a real-time monitoring sy...

Watching Government: Greece and energy in Europe

11/24/2014 Amid growing energy supply geopolitics, Greece is a stable anchor within a rapidly destabilizing region, Yannis Maniatis, its Environment, Energy, ...

Freeport LNG nears construction phase

11/19/2014 Freeport LNG Expansion LP expects later this month to close on financing and begin construction on the first two trains of its natural gas liquefac...

Woodside releases draft EIS for Browse LNG project

11/19/2014 Woodside Petroleum Ltd. has released its draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the proposed Browse LNG project offshore Western Australia.

ANGA president calls for sharper focus on gas transportation issues

11/17/2014 America’s Natural Gas Alliance Pres. Martin J. Durbin called for a stronger focus on transportation as he outlined issues that the US gas industry ...

White Papers

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by

AVEVA NET Accesses and Manages the Digital Asset

Global demand for new process plants, power plants and infrastructure is increasing steadily with the ...
Sponsored by

AVEVA’s Approach for the Digital Asset

To meet the requirements for leaner project execution and more efficient operations while transferring...
Sponsored by

Diversification - the technology aspects

In tough times, businesses seek to diversify into adjacent markets or to apply their skills and resour...
Sponsored by

Engineering & Design for Lean Construction

Modern marketing rhetoric claims that, in order to cut out expensive costs and reduce risks during the...
Sponsored by

Object Lessons - Why control of engineering design at the object level is essential for efficient project execution

Whatever the task, there is usually only one way to do it right and many more to do it wrong. In the c...
Sponsored by

Available Webcasts



The Future of US Refining

When Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

When Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Optimizing your asset management practices to mitigate the effects of a down market

Thu, Dec 11, 2014

The oil and gas market is in constant flux, and as the price of BOE (Barrel of Oil Equivalent) goes down it is increasingly important to optimize your asset management strategy to stay afloat.  Attend this webinar to learn how developing a solid asset management plan can help your company mitigate costs in any market.

register:WEBCAST


Parylene Conformal Coatings for the Oil & Gas Industry

Thu, Nov 20, 2014

In this concise 30-minute webinar, participants have an opportunity to learn more about how Parylene coatings are applied, their features, and the value they add to devices and components.

register:WEBCAST


Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected