NPRA asks House leaders to resist contradictory energy policy

Nick Snow
Washington Editor

WASHINGTON, DC, Aug. 25 -- Opening limited areas of the Outer Continental Shelf while enacting so-called "Use it or lose it" legislation and other counter-productive measures would be a mistake, said National Petrochemical and Refining Association Pres. Charles T. Drevna on Aug. 22.

"NPRA applauds Congress for initiating a serious dialogue about expanding domestic energy production. Unfortunately, recent statements indicate Congress may soon consider legislation that would only open limited portions of the [OCS] for domestic production and tie that policy to measures which could ultimately counteract the very supply increases our nation is hoping to achieve," he said in a letter to US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio).

"Such contradictory policies have the likely potential to threaten American energy supplies and security," he observed.

In addition to the "Use it or lose it" proposal, which many congressional Democrats say will pressure oil and gas producers to move faster on leases they already hold, Drevna also criticized calls to release crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to bring prices down, to make oil and gas companies ineligible for the federal tax code Section 199 manufacturing deduction, and to change existing Gulf of Mexico lease contracts.

"Unilaterally changing existing contracts would establish a dangerous precedent regarding confidence in the government to honor its contractual obligations. This could open the door for foreign state-owned companies to gain a foothold on US OCS energy production and cost American jobs," he warned.

He urged the House's Democratic and Republican leaders to fully consider the adverse impacts of such proposals as legislation develops. "Congress should not only open the entire OCS to energy exploration and production with no strings attached, but should also look to open portions of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge legally singled out for future oil and gas exploration," Drevna said.

"The question of domestic energy production is particularly important considering the fact that nationally-owned foreign oil companies control over 80% of global oil production, with public investor-owned companies in control of only about 13%," he continued.

Drevna's letter followed one that American Petroleum Institute Pres. Red Cavaney wrote US senators on Aug. 13 criticizing a proposal by a bipartisan group of 10 senators to open more of the OCS while imposing at least $30 billion in new taxes on oil and gas producers. Cavaney has said the so-called "Gang of 10's" plan was "light on new production and heavy on new taxes."

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com

Related Articles

MMS chief hopes next president, Congress won't reinstate OCS bans

12/19/2008 US Minerals Management Service Director Randall B. Luthi said on Dec. 9 that he hopes the Obama administration and Congress seriously consider expa...

FERC issues final EIS for proposed LNG project near Baltimore

12/19/2008 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's staff identified additional adverse environmental impacts as it issued a final environmental impact stat...

Gran Tierra defers Colombian pipeline project

12/17/2008 Gran Tierra Energy Inc., Calgary, has deferred a 100-km pipeline project in Colombia connecting Costayaco field to the Orito gathering facilities.

Petrobras gets loan for Revap refinery upgrades

12/14/2008 Brazil's Petrobras has borrowed ¥750 billion from a consortium of Japanese banks to finance its investments in the 226,000-b/d Henrique Lage (R...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected