Doha's collapse will cut energy use the hard way

Bob Tippee
Editor

Adherents of the minimalist approach to energy consumption have much to cheer in the collapse July 29 of the Doha Round of trade negotiations.

After all, anything that suppresses economic activity also crimps the use of energy and whatever environmental consequences come with it. To the minimalist camp, every reduction in the use of energy, especially hydrocarbon energy, advances humanity.

Failure of the Doha Round negotiations, over a special safeguard mechanism in farm products for developing countries, will suppress economic activity.

That doesn't have to mean disaster. During most of the nearly 7 years since the Doha Round began, trade has flourished, and the global economy has mostly expanded.

A world trade agreement is neither essential to trade nor the only type of agreement possible. Doha's collapse doesn't preclude new regional or bilateral deals.

Furthermore, as World Trade Organization officials were quick to assert, the latest stalemate doesn't mean the round is finished.

The outlook, though, isn't cheery. If anything, protectionism, especially involving farm products, is hardening.

China and India, with growing populations beginning to reap the fruits of industrialization, have received blame for holding fast to their farm subsidies. But Europe and the US were hardly magnanimous in this area.

In the US, in fact, Congress seems to have turned hostile toward trade in general and farm trade in particular. Earlier this year, it overrode a veto of a farm bill loaded with subsidies and blocked a trade agreement with Colombia using a rules change that has hurt US creditability on trade issues.

While a stalled Doha Round need not be disastrous for the global economy, it surely won't help.

Trade benefits economies and fosters development. An agreement lowering barriers would boost trade and thus stimulate economies.

So even if the world's economic system stays healthy without a successful and fair outcome from the Doha Round and despite high energy prices and other troubles, it's reasonable to think it would have become healthier with one.

That's one a way to conserve energy. But it's a tough way. Ask anyone who's chronically hungry.

(Online Aug. 1, 2008; author's e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

Texas Petro Index reaches record-high for February

04/15/2014 The Texas Petro Index (TPI), a composite index based on a comprehensive group of upstream economic indicators released by the Texas Alliance of Ene...

MARKET WATCH: Brent prices climb on Ukraine, Libya news; NYMEX oil follows

04/15/2014 Ongoing political instability in Ukraine and Libya continued to drive up crude oil futures prices on New York and London markets Apr. 14 to their h...

MARKET WATCH: Crude oil futures price trends higher at week’s end

04/14/2014

The crude oil futures contract trended higher at the close of the week ended Apr. 11.

EIA: LNG shows potential as a railroad fuel

04/14/2014 Continued growth in US natural gas production and substantially lower gas prices compared with crude oil prices lead to strong potential for fuelin...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected