Doha's collapse will cut energy use the hard way

Bob Tippee
Editor

Adherents of the minimalist approach to energy consumption have much to cheer in the collapse July 29 of the Doha Round of trade negotiations.

After all, anything that suppresses economic activity also crimps the use of energy and whatever environmental consequences come with it. To the minimalist camp, every reduction in the use of energy, especially hydrocarbon energy, advances humanity.

Failure of the Doha Round negotiations, over a special safeguard mechanism in farm products for developing countries, will suppress economic activity.

That doesn't have to mean disaster. During most of the nearly 7 years since the Doha Round began, trade has flourished, and the global economy has mostly expanded.

A world trade agreement is neither essential to trade nor the only type of agreement possible. Doha's collapse doesn't preclude new regional or bilateral deals.

Furthermore, as World Trade Organization officials were quick to assert, the latest stalemate doesn't mean the round is finished.

The outlook, though, isn't cheery. If anything, protectionism, especially involving farm products, is hardening.

China and India, with growing populations beginning to reap the fruits of industrialization, have received blame for holding fast to their farm subsidies. But Europe and the US were hardly magnanimous in this area.

In the US, in fact, Congress seems to have turned hostile toward trade in general and farm trade in particular. Earlier this year, it overrode a veto of a farm bill loaded with subsidies and blocked a trade agreement with Colombia using a rules change that has hurt US creditability on trade issues.

While a stalled Doha Round need not be disastrous for the global economy, it surely won't help.

Trade benefits economies and fosters development. An agreement lowering barriers would boost trade and thus stimulate economies.

So even if the world's economic system stays healthy without a successful and fair outcome from the Doha Round and despite high energy prices and other troubles, it's reasonable to think it would have become healthier with one.

That's one a way to conserve energy. But it's a tough way. Ask anyone who's chronically hungry.

(Online Aug. 1, 2008; author's e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

Industry group welcomes most UK budget moves

03/21/2014 Oil & Gas UK voiced support for all but one of several measures affecting the offshore producing industry announced in the UK government’s annu...

MARKET WATCH: Crude oil, gas futures prices slide entering spring

03/21/2014

The first day of spring in the northern hemisphere was marked by lower crude oil and natural gas futures prices.

API: Petroleum demand dips in February

03/21/2014 Total US petroleum deliveries, a measure of demand, fell 0.6% from February 2013 to average 18.5 million b/d last month, a 16-year low for the mont...

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil for April tops $100/bbl

03/20/2014 Crude oil futures prices for the April contract climbed above $100/bbl on the New York market on Mar. 19, which analysts attributed to positive ind...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected