Congressional oil price focus moves to non-commercial, institutional investors

Heating up: Congressional interest in the influence of non-commercial, institutional investors on crude oil prices. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will hold a hearing April 3 on that very subject as lawmakers try to determine what has pushed crude prices past $100/bbl. Several are convinced that it's more than market fundamentals and want to learn, for example, if there's any truth behind allegations that unregulated hedge funds are buying oil and putting it into storage simply to push prices higher. This is possibly the most entertaining oil price theory since New Jersey officials claimed during the 1970s that tankers were parking offshore so their cargo would be more valuable when it finally was unloaded.

Others would like to see energy futures trading regulated more closely. Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, wants all transactions to follow the same disclosure rules. "As much as half of energy trading occurs without transparency and without oversight. Speculation and market manipulation in the energy futures market can create a snowball effect and consumers ultimately pay the price when they are heating their homes or putting gas in their cars," he said on Feb. 1.

Cooling off: Allegations that refiners are manipulating retail prices for oil products. Stupak still wants to make so-called "price gouging" a federal crime. So does Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), a member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. But public and political attention is focused farther upstream on crude oil prices. That could change in the next few weeks if gasoline prices break the $3.50/gal retail price barrier before Memorial Day, as the Energy Information Administration has predicted.

Give the 110th Congress some credit, however: Most of its members aren't blaming the oil industry for the current high prices. Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) are saying that the majors are making record profits as a result, but their main interest is in raising taxes to fund incentives for alternative and renewable energy projects. The fact that 2008 is an election year also suggests that the anti-oil rhetoric could intensify once federal lawmakers return from their spring recess.

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com

Related Articles

Environmental groups to challenge FWS’s lesser prairie chicken ruling

04/11/2014 Three environmental organizations notified the US Fish and Wildlife Service that they plan to sue over the US Department of the Interior agency’s r...

Heitkamp leads Senate Democrats’ new push for Keystone XL approval

04/10/2014 Ten other US Senate Democrats joined Heidi Heitkamp (ND) in urging US President Barack Obama to approve the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pipeline...

GlobalData: US needs to ‘fast-track’ LNG exports to compete in global market

04/09/2014 The US’s lack of approved export terminals has prevented energy companies from competing in the growing global LNG market, despite the fact that th...

US House subcommittee passes bill to facilitate LNG exports

04/09/2014 A US House Energy and Commerce Committee subcommittee voted to forward a bill aimed at facilitating approvals of US LNG exports to the full committ...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected