A high-stakes appeal before a high court

The US Supreme Court moved one step closer to addressing a $2.5 billion question this term when it placed Exxon Shipping Co. vs. Baker on its docket on Feb. 1 and scheduled arguments for Feb. 27.

The case stems from the March 24, 1989 grounding of the tanker Exxon Valdez in Prince William Sound and the resulting discharge of more than 11 million gallons of crude oil into the Alaskan coastal waters.

More than 250 lawsuits by area fishermen, processors, Alaska Natives, landowners, businesses and others were consolidated into a single action. A jury awarded plaintiffs $297 million of compensatory damages and $5 billion of punitive damages following a four-month trial in 1994.

Exxon Mobil Corp. appealed the punitive damages award, which the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals cut to $2.5 billion on Dec. 22, 2006. The company's attorneys appealed to the Supreme Court, which agreed on Oct. 29, 2007, to hear the petition.

In a statement at the time, Exxon Mobil expressed deep regret for the spill and said that all compensatory claims have been resolved. "We have spent over $3.5 billion as a result of the accident, including compensatory payments, cleanup payments settlements and fines," it noted.

'Further punishment'

"The punitive damages case has never been about compensating people for actual damages. Rather it is about whether further punishment of Exxon Mobil is warranted. The company does not believe any punitive damages are warranted in this case," the statement continued.

Alaskan government officials disagree. In a brief that it filed with the Supreme Court on Jan. 29, it asserted that maritime law permits a court to hold what then was Exxon Corp. responsible for the conduct of its employee, Joseph J. Hazelwood, the ship's captain. It also argued that the federal Clean Water Act does not prevent injured parties from obtaining punitive damages, which the state considers a deterrent to unsafe conduct.

"Exxon's arguments, if they prevail, would not only deny Alaskans compensation to which they are due, but would reduce the incentive for those who use our coastal waters to operate in a careful and safe manner." Alaska Attorney General Talis Colberg maintained.

Alaska's congressional delegation also filed a brief. So did the state's legislature, which was joined by former governors Walter J. Hickel, Tony Knowles, Steve C. Cowper and William J. Sheffield. The high court also received briefs from 26 other groups and individuals including the International Association of Tanker Owners, American Petroleum Institute, International Association of Drilling Contractors, US Chamber of Commerce, American Institute of Marine Underwriters, Jean-Michel Cousteau and other scientists, and Maryland and 33 other states.

Three primary questions

In its docket placement notice, the Supreme Court said that Exxon Mobil indicated that Exxon Mobil's lawyers asked three primary questions:

First, may punitive damages be imposed under maritime law against a ship's owner (as the Ninth Circuit held, contrary to decisions of the First, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Circuits) for conduct of a ship's master at sea without a finding that the owner directed, countenanced or participated in that conduct, and even when the conduct was contrary to policies established and enforced by the owner?

Second, when Congress has specified the criminal and civil penalties for maritime conduct in a controlling statute (the Clean Water Act in this case) but has not provided for punitive damages, may judge-made federal maritime law (as the Ninth Circuit held contrary to four other circuits) expand the penalties Congress provided by adding a punitive damages remedy?

Third, is this $2.5 billion punitive damages award, which Exxon Mobil's lawyers said is larger than the total of all punitive damages awards affirmed by federal appellate courts in US history, within the limits allowed by (1) federal maritime law or (2) if maritime law could permit such an award, constitutional due process?

The Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to all but the second part of the third question. The arguments before the court on Feb. 27 should be interesting. The court's decision later this year promises to be very significant.

Contact Nick Snow at nicks@pennwell.com.

Related Articles

DOI issues final rule for fracing on public, tribal lands

03/20/2015 The US Department of the Interior issued a long-anticipated final rule to govern hydraulic fracturing of onshore oil and gas wells on public and tr...

Total’s Donges refinery due 10-week shutdown, overhaul

03/20/2015 Total SA is planning a nearly 2-month shutdown of its 220,000-b/d Donges refinery near Saint Nazaire, France, on the Loire estuary, for a complete ...

Transco files FERC application for Dalton expansion project

03/20/2015 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co. LLC (Transco), a wholly owned subsidiary of Williams Partners LP, has filed an application with the US Federal E...

Counties, associations challenge DOI’s Greater Sage Grouse tactics

03/20/2015 A coalition of national and regional oil, gas, coal, and mining associations and county governments in four Rocky Mountain states charged three US ...

Senate crude exports hearing raises price, logistics, safety issues

03/19/2015 Potential consumer price impacts dominated a US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing examining whether to allow more exports of do...

UK budget includes oil and gas tax relief

03/18/2015

The UK government has delivered on promises made late last year to ease the tax burden on the struggling offshore oil and gas industry.

Chevron, Shell among most active bidders in central gulf sale

03/18/2015 Chevron Corp., ExxonMobil Corp., Royal Dutch Shell PLC, and Statoil ASA mostly led the way as Gulf of Mexico central planning area Lease Sale 235 d...

SPE/IADC: Collaboration, innovation must transcend oil price

03/18/2015 Leaders from oil and gas operators and drilling contractors were empanelled Mar. 17 at the 2015 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference & Exposition to ta...

Senate, House bills introduced to block EPA ozone proposal

03/18/2015 US Senate and House members introduced bills to block the US Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal to lower ground-level ozone limits as the p...
White Papers

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...
Available Webcasts


Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected