Woodside seeks liquefaction site off W. Australia

Rick Wilkinson
OGJ Correspondent

ADELAIDE, Apr. 20 -- Woodside Petroleum is considering building its $10 billion Browse basin LNG liquefaction plant on the Scott coral reef some 420 km from Broome off Kimberley, Western Australia. Woodside is project operator and owns 50%.

Woodside's development director Peter Moore told the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration (APPEA) Conference in Adelaide this week it is considering a lagoon-based plant on the reef, which is midway between Australia and Indonesia.

Although not providing plant cost estimates, Moore said this offshore facility should cost several billion dollars less than an onshore plant.

The company also is considering six offshore sites between Broome and the Buccaneer Archipelago.

The three fields that would serve as feedstock for LNG production—Torosa, Brecknock, and Calliance— have reserves estimated at 20 tcf. First production is slated for 2013-14, which will require the Woodside group to select a plant site by yearend.

Scott Reef would pose a number of environmental problems, as would a land-based plant, but the offshore location would obviate the need for a pipeline to shore.

At the conference World Wildlife Fund (WWF) CEO Greg Bourne opposed Woodside's plans, saying coral reef systems such as Scott Reef represent an important and increasingly threatened marine ecosystem type.

"To construct a facility there would attract global attention; generate global outrage, and become Australia's 'Anwar,' to its shame, regardless of the scale of development," he said.

"We (at WWF) want to see Australian oil and gas operators known for their legacy of sensible development and environmental leadership and not be known as the first to dismantle a coral ecosystem like Scott Reef in the name of purely economic progress."

Bourne, a former CEO of BP Australia, suggested that state and federal governments and industry cooperate to establish a single production hub in the Kimberley region for all the potential Browse basin LNG projects that have been considered in the last few years rather than having each company scatter plants along the pristine Kimberley coast.

He said WWF is by no means antidevelopment or antigas development, but emphasized that companies should not be single-minded in their drive to push through the cheapest economic option. He said there must be a balance among economic, social, and environmental considerations.

Related Articles

LNG Ltd. unit appoints top executives

04/07/2014 Liquefied Natural Gas Ltd. has named John G. Baguley as chief operating officer and Rick R. Cape as chief commercial officer for the company’s whol...

LNG UPDATE Global LNG supply, demand remain tight

04/07/2014 As 2014 began, global LNG supply and demand remained largely in balance. Only two liquefaction plants came on stream last year, while several new o...

Cheniere, Endesa sign Corpus Christi LNG deal

04/02/2014 Corpus Christi Liquefaction LLC, a subsidiary of Cheniere Energy Inc., has signed an LNG sale and purchase agreement (SPA) with Spanish multination...

Senate Republicans introduce energy amendment to jobs bill

04/02/2014 Three Republican members of the US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee introduced legislation that would approve the Keystone XL crude oi...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected