Maryland officials oppose plan for Baltimore LNG terminal

Nick Snow
Washington Correspondent

WASHINGTON, DC, Apr. 24 -- Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, members of the state's congressional delegation, and county and local officials expressed strong opposition on Apr. 23 to AES Corp.'s plan to build an LNG terminal and regasification plant at the mouth of Baltimore's harbor.

US Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) told a House subcommittee field hearing in Baltimore that the proposed installation's Sparrows Point location raises security and evacuation questions as serious as those emerging since the LNG terminal at Cove Point farther down Chesapeake Bay reopened.

"One month after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, [the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] approved Cove Point's application," she said. "Now, 5 years later, the Coast Guard has said it will no longer provide waterside security at Cove Point. They're essentially turning it over to the LNG company and the county," she said.

O'Malley noted that while the Cove Point terminal is in a relatively remote area, Sparrows Point is in an area that would be difficult to evacuate in an emergency. There also might be impacts during normal operations, he suggested.

"One would think that if you need a 1,500-ft security ring around an LNG tanker, it would raise concerns about possibly having to close the [Chesapeake Bay] bridge when a shipment came through. That would have an impact on being able to reach Ocean City and other parts of Maryland's Atlantic coast and the eastern shore" of Chesapeake Bay, the governor said.

Other Maryland congressional and local government officials expressed concerns during the hearing called by Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee's Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Subcommittee.

Put WSA on hold
Local governments should be included in these processes, said Baltimore County Executive James T. Smith Jr., who recommended that the Waterway Suitability Assessment for the proposed LNG import facility be put on hold until the US Coast Guard identifies local government's concerns.

But Richard R. Hoffmann, FERC's gas, environment, and engineering director, said FERC staff members have already visited terminal and pipeline sites, met with public officials, and gathered other information for the draft environmental impact statement being prepared for the Sparrows Point LNG proposal. "It's essential that state and local officials be involved in the preauthorization, preconstruction and preoperation," he said.

In written testimony, Hoffmann said Maryland's Department of Natural Resources expressed several concerns Feb. 7 as part of the state advisory report required under the 2005 Energy Policy Act for new LNG import projects.

"Right now, the primary issues are safety and security, impacts on boating and recreational activity, dredging concerns, environmental justice, concerns along the pipeline route, and its proximity to people and businesses. We'll look at all that and thoroughly examine every issue that's brought before us before we issue our draft EIS," he said at the hearing.

He said FERC has denied only one LNG terminal application so far, but other proposed projects have been withdrawn as questions emerged. The commission, he said, has an open process and takes all of these concerns into account. "Our work with the Coast Guard, with the Environmental Protection Agency, and with other government agencies tries to facilitate this," Hoffmann said.

Layers of enforcement
Rear Adm. Brian Salerno, the Coast Guard's inspection and compliance director, cited modern LNG vessels' safety record and advanced engineering specifications, saying security "requires layers of procedures and enforcement."

Capt. Brian D. Kelley, who directs the Coast Guard's Baltimore sectors covering Chesapeake Bay from its mouth to the Delaware state line and the Potomac River to Washington, said he currently is reviewing the risk assessment submitted by AES, an Arlington, Va., global gas and power project developer.

Aaron Samson, LNG projects director at AES, said the introduction of additional LNG traffic in Chesapeake Bay would have little impact on existing large vessel traffic, which already includes petroleum and ethanol tankers.

"[Incoming] LNG shipping in the Chesapeake may cause minor inconvenience to other vessels while they are under way. But they would occur only for about 3-4 minutes in the immediate area and only two or three times a week," he said.

Sparrows Point is one of three LNG import projects AES has proposed along the US East Coast. A second in the Bahamas would use an undersea pipeline to ship revaporized gas to Florida markets, while a third would be on one of Boston Harbor's outer islands. AES has operated an LNG import terminal in the Dominican Republic since 2003 and continues to run 30 power plants overseas safely, Samson said.

"Big energy infrastructure affecting people's land and rights are emotional issues. LNG is not well understood because our country hasn't had to import much of its natural gas supplies from overseas until now. We were in the community 6 months before we filed our first application papers at FERC for our Sparrows Point project," he observed.

But US Rep. C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger (D-Md.), whose district includes two communities near the proposed LNG facility's site, said the project would hurt revitalization projects and harm area neighborhoods.

"To reach this location, tankers would have to travel up the Chesapeake Bay past Cove Point, past the Calvert Cliffs nuclear plant, beneath the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, where traffic now averages 95,000 vehicles during each summertime Saturday, and to a densely populated area," he said.

"We have to recognize that the world environment we live in is dangerous. Terrorists not only want to hurt us, but they want to do so in a spectacular fashion. We're moving quickly to address our energy needs. But I fear that in our haste, we're not addressing safety considerations," Ruppersberger maintained.

Contact Nick Snow at nsnow@cox.net.

Related Articles

Inpex starts development drilling at Ichthys field

02/04/2015

Inpex Corp. has started development drilling in Ichthys gas-condensate field in the Browse basin, about 200 km offshore Western Australia.

BG’s 2015 budget ‘significantly lower than 2014’

02/03/2015 BG Group plans capital expenditures on a cash basis of $6-7 billion in 2015, a range it says is “significantly lower than 2014” due to “a lower oil...

Live Oak LNG to build Calcasieu Ship Channel liquefaction, export site

02/03/2015 Live Oak LNG LLC, a subsidiary of Parallax Energy LLC, Houston, will invest $2 billion to develop a 5-million tonne/year liquefaction plant and LNG...

Woodside gets NEB approval for British Columbia LNG exports

02/02/2015 Woodside Energy Holdings Pty. Ltd. has received approval from Canada’s National Energy Board on its application for a 25-year natural gas export li...

E&Y: Oil-price collapse to boost global M&A activity in 2015

02/02/2015 The oil-price collapse will facilitate increased global transaction activity in 2015 as companies revise and implement new strategies, according to...

Shell cancels Arrow LNG project

01/30/2015

Royal Dutch Shell PLC has abandoned its plans for what would have been a fourth coal seam gas-LNG project at Gladstone in Queensland.

DOE could meet 45-day LNG export decision deadline, Senate panel told

01/29/2015 The US Department of Energy would have no trouble meeting a 45-day deadline to reach a national interest determination for proposed LNG export faci...

Douglas Channel LNG moves toward 2018 startup

01/29/2015 Exmar NV, EDF Trading, and AIJVLP, a joint venture of AltaGas Ltd. and Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd., have taken full ownership of the 550,000 tonne/year...

Mitsui charters two more LNG ships for Cameron export project

01/29/2015 Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Tokyo, reports contracts for chartering two new ships to transport LNG to Japan from the Cameron LNG export project in Loui...
White Papers

Pipeline Integrity: Best Practices to Prevent, Detect, and Mitigate Commodity Releases

Commodity releases can have catastrophic consequences, so ensuring pipeline integrity is crucial for p...
Sponsored by

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...
Available Webcasts


Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected