Ethanol thrives on word tricks of persuasion

Bob Tippee
Editor

While ethanol claims a burgeoning share of the US fuel market, courtesy of taxpayers, a once-common name for gasoline-alcohol blends remains in relative disuse.

Remember gasohol?

It's what everyone called 90:10 gasoline-ethanol blends when they cruised into the motor fuel market aboard generous tax breaks in the 1980s.

Ethanol makers disliked the noun, though. Years ago, someone from a large ethanol maker called this writer to complain about repeated reference to "gasohol" in an editorial. Fuel so named had become difficult to sell, he explained. Motorists associated the term with engine-performance problems that many of them had experienced with gasoline-alcohol blends.

The gripe must have been part of a larger and apparently successful campaign. Despite ethanol's new popularity as a fuel additive, the word "gasohol" is colloquial at best.

Remember when labels first appeared on gasoline pumps to let consumers know which of them dispensed fuel containing ethanol?

Ethanol makers, fearful of a market preference for neat gasoline, protested the disclosure. They called it a sinister tactic of Big Oil.

Consumer attitudes about gasohol have reversed, of course—thanks somewhat to improvements in fuel chemistry but mostly to management of public opinion.

Americans have heard for years that ethanol in fuel offers supply and environmental advantages worthy of lavish public support. They apparently believe ethanol represents an energy panacea that costs nothing, despite clear evidence to the contrary.

So what a triumph of persuasion it was when Congress passed the ethanol mandate in the Energy Policy Act of 2005! What victory sparkled in President George W. Bush's call in January to quintuple the mandate!

Linguistic tricks persist. They're essential to the shaping of attitudes. In Texas and Ohio, Kroger stores are marketing (as opposed to selling much) E85, the 85:15 ethanol-gasoline blend that requires flex-fuel engines.

The grocery chain's gasoline pumps—the ones with traffic, as opposed to the E85 dispensers with giant ears of corn painted on their sides—sport this label: "Enriched by 10% ethanol."

Enriched?

It makes you wonder if, in the event of some hopefully improbable lapse in the produce department, Kroger would post signs touting lettuce as "Enlivened by bugs."

This column will appear next on May 4.

(Online Apr. 20, 2007; author's e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

Judge bars Anadarko e-mails as evidence in Macondo blowout hearing

03/21/2014 A federal district judge in New Orleans refused to accept e-mails between Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and BP PLC as evidence in a hearing to determine...

Industry group welcomes most UK budget moves

03/21/2014 Oil & Gas UK voiced support for all but one of several measures affecting the offshore producing industry announced in the UK government’s annu...

Analyst urges broader look at Amazon oil resources’ local impacts

03/21/2014 Increasingly disruptive protests are likely if oil, gas, and mining companies and national governments don’t pay closer attention to indigenous pop...

BOEM extends proposed higher offshore liability limit comment period

03/20/2014 The US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management added 30 days to the public comment period for its proposed higher liability limit for offshore oil and ga...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected