Federal probe cites budget cuts for BP plant blast

Nick Snow
Washington Correspondent

WASHINGTON, DC, Oct. 31 -- Years of budget reductions contributed to conditions leading up to the Mar. 23, 2005, explosion at BP America Inc.'s 460,000-b/d Texas City, Tex., refinery, which killed 15 workers and injured 180 others, the US Chemical Safety Board said Oct. 30.

Investigators also found that BP was aware of problems at the facility but implemented reforms aimed at improving compliance with procedures and reducing occupational injuries while ignoring potentially catastrophic safety risks, the CSB said as it released preliminary findings of its investigation.

It was the first significant update of the board's investigation since Oct. 27, 2005, when the first set of findings was released at a public meeting of Texas City residents and refinery employees. The CSB scheduled an additional news conference for Oct. 31 in Houston but said it probably would not issue a final report before March 2007 because the investigation is so complex.

"Unsafe and antiquated equipment designs were left in place, and unacceptable deficiencies in preventive maintenance were tolerated," CSB Chairman Carolyn W. Merritt said.

Previously, the board indicated that the equipment involved in the explosion of an isomerization unit was of an obsolete design that had been phased out at most other refineries and that supervisors at the Texas City plant knew key instruments did not work or were unreliable (OGJ, Nov. 21, 2005, p. 32).

BP spokesman Ronnie Chappell said the company agrees with the CSB's conclusions that the accident could have been prevented. He said the findings of its own investigation are generally consistent with those of the CSB's inquiry (OGJ, Jan. 23, 2006, p. 51).

"We do not understand the basis for some of the comments made by the CSB," he said by e-mail on Oct. 31. "We have and will continue to discuss our concerns with the board. We are not going to comment publicly on the statement of the CSB until the board issues a final written report that we hope will explain in more detail the basis for some of their preliminary findings."

Budget cuts
Stringent budget cuts across BP PLC's worldwide operations caused safety at the Texas City refinery to deteriorate, Merritt said. "BP implemented a 25% cut on fixed costs from 1998 to 2000 that adversely impacted maintenance expenditures and infrastructure at the refinery," she said.

Maintenance spending had fallen through the 1990s when Amoco Corp. owned the refinery, according to Merritt. Additional cuts were imposed after BP acquired Amoco, she said.

"Every successful corporation must contain its costs. But at an aging facility like Texas City, it is not responsible to cut budgets related to safety and maintenance without thoroughly examining the impact on the risk of a catastrophic accident," she maintained.

CSB found that, by 2002, an internal BP report had identified cost reductions as a contributor to eroding infrastructure at the refinery that would take a large investment to correct.

These findings were corroborated in a 2005 survey of the refinery's safety culture known as the Telos study just prior to the accident, the federal investigators found. They said the survey's interview with the refinery's manager identified a history of reduced budgets and a culture of "things not getting fixed."

Merritt said: "The refinery manager was not alone in this candid assessment. Large majorities of the survey respondents reported significant maintenance backlogs that were harming safety. Disturbingly, most employees agreed that 'production and budget compliance gets recognized before anything else at Texas City.'"

Economic pressures were apparent in many decisions that contributed to the explosion, the CSB said. In 2002, the refinery undertook an environmental initiative known as Clean Streams, which led to plans to eliminate the isomerization unit blowdown drum involved in the March 2005 explosion.

"To economize, a decision was made not to replace the blowdown drum with a flare system," said Don Holmstrom, CSB lead investigator. "The refinery did not conduct federally required safety reviews that likely would have taken into account BP's own existing policy recommending the elimination of blowdown drums."

A required study of the isomerization unit's relief valve system was never completed, although the need was first identified in 1993, the CSB added.

It also found that the refinery's central training staff was reduced from 30 employees in 1997 to 8 in 2004, and the training department budget was cut in half from 1998 to 2004. Trainers also were given other duties so that some spent little time actually training other employees, it said. The isomerization trainer spent only 5% of his time on training, the CSB said.

The control board operations staff also was shrunk, and workloads were increased, the investigators found. Four open-process safety coordinator positions for the isomerization and other area units were not filled prior to the explosion, the CSB said. Its earlier preliminary findings cited operator fatigue and a lack of effective training and supervision.

Culture problems
Chappell said BP's own investigation, which acknowledges the company was aware of infrastructure and safety culture problems at the refinery before the explosion and fire, found that the problems were "many years in the making."

It also notes that BP was working to address the problems before the accident by spending more money on operations, maintenance, and plant integrity and through efforts to reduce the number of workplace accidents and injuries, Chappell said.

The company held discussions of previous fatal accidents at the refinery and put in place a new "control of work" audit team to ensure compliance with safety rules during maintenance and other activities at the plant, he added.

Chappell said that while BP achieved a 70% reduction in workplace injury rates at Texas City, the CSB's investigators "determined these efforts were not sufficient because they focused on personal safety rather than process safety." He said the lower workplace injury rates led the company "to believe that conditions at the refinery were improving."

He also said BP's own investigation did not identify previous budget decisions or lack of expenditures as a critical factor or immediate cause of the accident.

"Indeed, the [BP] report points out that maintenance and turnaround spending in the years prior to the incident had increased as Texas City staff addressed the safety and plant integrity issues of greatest concern. Maintenance spending had increased 40% over the previous 5 years and was higher than the industry average per barrel of throughput," Chappell said.

He said BP is eliminating the use of blowdown stacks in heavier-than-air light hydrocarbon service and will eliminate their use at Texas City when it recommissions the refinery and at other BP facilities in the US by 2008.

The company also has adopted a new engineering technical practice governing the use of temporary buildings in refineries and other plants and has moved more than 200 such buildings out of the Texas City refinery or emptied and locked them, he said.

"At Texas City, the new management team has simplified the organization, clarified accountabilities, and removed hundreds of workers from process areas," Chappell said. "BP will spend more than $1 billion at Texas City over the next 5 years to refurbish and rebuild key gasoline production units, install modern process control systems, transition to a more powerful maintenance management system, improve worker training and implement the other recommendations contained in our final report."

Merritt also praised BP's actions following the accident. The company "has expressed a strong desire to improve its safety performance globally, has made organizational changes to better identify and communicate risks, and has done extensive positive outreach to the rest of the industrial community," she said.

She noted that BP also followed the CSB's recommendation that it voluntarily fund and support the work of an independent panel examining the company's safety culture. The panel, chaired by former US Sec. of State James A. Baker III, is expected to report its findings on the safety of BP's five North American refineries in late November.

Contact Nick Snow at nsnow@cox.net.

Related Articles

India’s IOC plans capacity expansion at Barauni refinery

08/11/2015 State-owned Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. (IOC) has informed India’s federal government that it will increase crude oil processing capacity at the company’...

EIA: US crude output declines to continue through mid-2016

08/11/2015 Total US crude oil production declined 100,000 b/d in July compared with June, and is expected to continue decreasing through mid-2016 before growt...

Lower oil prices have strengthened the role of unconventional in upstream portfolios

08/11/2015 When oil prices went into free fall in the fourth quarter of 2014, the question on everyone's mind was whether US unconventional development would ...

KMI starts Powder River deliveries on Double H pipeline

08/11/2015 Kinder Morgan Inc. (KMI) has begun receiving Powder River basin crude oil into its Double H pipeline system via a newly constructed connection near...

Uganda names 16 firms eligible for first licensing round


Uganda’s government has granted approval to 16 companies to bid on exploration rights for six blocks in the nation’s Albertine Graben region.

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil prices rose to nearly $45/bbl

08/11/2015 Both light, sweet crude oil and Brent crude oil prices rose more than $1/bbl on the New York and London markets Aug. 10, but prices appeared to be ...

Eventful first half for Petrobras ends with income down 43%

08/10/2015 During a first half in which it endured a massive anticorruption probe and tax dispute with Brazilian authorities, Petroleo Brasileiro SA (Petrobra...

California pipeline leak to cost at least $257 million, PAA estimates

08/10/2015 A crude oil pipeline leak north of Santa Barbara, Calif., will cost Plains All American Pipeline LP at least $257 million, the Houston midstream tr...

Keyera takes 50% stake in portion of Grand Rapids pipeline

08/10/2015 Keyera Corp. has agreed to acquire 50% interest in the southernmost section of the 20-in. diluent Grand Rapids pipeline, entering into a 50-50 join...
White Papers

UAS Integration for Infrastructure: More than Just Flying

Oil and gas companies recognize the benefits that the use of drones or unmanned aerial systems (UAS) c...

Solutions to Financial Distress Resulting from a Weak Oil and Gas Price Environment

The oil and gas industry is in the midst of a prolonged worldwide downturn in commodity prices. While ...
Sponsored by

2015 Global Engineering Information Management Solutions Competitive Strategy Innovation and Leadership Award

The Frost & Sullivan Best Practices Awards recognise companies in a variety of regional and global...
Sponsored by

Three Tips to Improve Safety in the Oil Field

Working oil fields will always be tough work with inherent risks. There’s no getting around that. Ther...
Sponsored by

Pipeline Integrity: Best Practices to Prevent, Detect, and Mitigate Commodity Releases

Commodity releases can have catastrophic consequences, so ensuring pipeline integrity is crucial for p...
Sponsored by

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by
Available Webcasts

The Resilient Oilfield in the Internet of Things World

When Tue, Sep 22, 2015

As we hear about the hype surrounding the Internet of Things, the oil and gas industry is questioning what is different than what is already being done. What is new?  Using sensors and connecting devices is nothing new to our mode of business and in many ways the industry exemplifies many principles of an industrial internet of things. How does the Internet of Things impact the oil and gas industry?

Prolific instrumentation and automation digitized the industry and has changed the approach to business models calling for a systems led approach.  Resilient Systems have the ability to adapt to changing circumstances while maintaining their central purpose.  A resilient system, such as Maximo, allows an asset intensive organization to leverage connected devices by merging real-time asset information with other critical asset information and using that information to create a more agile organization.  

Join this webcast, sponsored by IBM, to learn how about Internet of Things capabilities and resilient systems are impacting the landscape of the oil and gas industry.


On Demand

Taking the Headache out of Fuel License and Exemption Certificates: How to Ensure Compliance

Tue, Aug 25, 2015

This webinar, brought to you by Avalara, will detail the challenges of tax document management, as well as recommend solutions for fuel suppliers. You will learn:

-    Why it’s critical to track business partner licenses and exemption documents
-    The four key business challenges of ensuring tax compliance through document management
-    Best practice business processes to minimize exposure to tax errors


Driving Growth and Efficiency with Deep Insights into Operational Data

Wed, Aug 19, 2015

Capitalizing on today’s momentum in Oil & Gas requires operational excellence based on a clear view of what your business data is telling you. Which is why nearly half* of oil and gas companies have deployed SAP HANA or have it on their roadmap.

Join SAP and Red Hat to learn more about using data to drive process improvements and identify new opportunities with the SAP HANA platform running on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This webinar will also show how your choice of infrastructure impacts the performance of core business applications and your ability to achieve data-driven insights quickly and reliably.

*48% use SAP, http://go.sap.com/solution/industry/oil-gas.html


OGJ's Midyear Forecast 2015

Fri, Jul 10, 2015

This webcast is to be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and Senior Economic Editor Conglin Xu.  They will summarize the Midyear Forecast projections in key categories, note important changes from January’s forecasts, and examine reasons for the adjustments.


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!


Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected