CONGRESS GETS NEW LEADER IN ENERGY SILLINESS CONTEST

Bob Tippee
Editor

US Democrats have pulled ahead of Republicans in the congressional competition for the silliest proposal for energy.

Senate Republicans leaped to an early lead last month with their ill-fated plan to bribe voters with $100 apiece for gasoline (OGJ Online, Apr. 28, 2006).

But House Democrats zipped by them on May 11 when Reps. Rick Boucher of Virginia and John Dingell of Michigan filed legislation to federalize refining.

Citing damage to refineries from last year's hurricanes and consequent increases in fuel prices, the congressmen proposed a Strategic Refining Reserve.

They would commit the secretary of energy to build or restart, then operate, refineries with capacities totaling 5% of US product demand—about 1 million b/d. The aim: to ensure processing capacity is available during supply emergencies warranting withdrawal of crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

Between emergencies, the People's Refineries would produce fuel for military services.

The capacity target represents five average-size refineries. Running such a collection of assets, amounting to a large independent refining company, is a lot to ask of a cabinet officer traditionally selected on the basis of qualities other than energy expertise. But there are always subcontractors.

Of course, the People's Refineries would have to be run under politically acceptable conditions, meaning that they never be visible to anybody; that they prove before construction that they'd never have accidents; that they emit no pollution; that they benefit favored political constituencies; and that they disturb no ecosystems.

Subject as they'd be to political manipulation and unburdened by efficiencies sought by their privately owned counterparts, the People's Refineries would be costly to build and operate. To help with expenses, they'd want to sell whatever of their products the military didn't need—at cost so as not to gouge consumers. The government would pay the rest.

As the People's Refineries came on stream, commercial refineries now supplying the military would have to seek other markets or shut capacity. Expensive refining capacity needing heavy government funding thus would displace commercial capacity now generating tax revenue. Eventually, there'd be no "reserve," only cost.

In the silliness contest, this will be hard for Republicans to beat.

Note: This feature will appear next on May 26, 2006.

(Online May 12, 2006; author's e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

IHS International: US poised to lead world exports of LPG

03/25/2014 US shale gas development has the country poised to become a major global supplier of LPG, mainly to Asia, during 2015-20 with US exports outdistanc...

BASF-Total venture starts up 10th furnace at Port Arthur steam cracker

03/24/2014

BASF Total Petrochemicals LCC (BTP) reported the startup of a 10th furnace at its steam cracker facility in Port Arthur, Tex.

Phillips 66 considers splitter at Sweeny refinery

03/21/2014 Phillips 66 is evaluating the potential for the addition of a condensate splitter near its 247,000-b/d Sweeny refinery in Old Ocean, Tex., just sou...

Second small diesel refinery planned for North Dakota

03/21/2014 Quantum Energy Inc. (QEI), Tempe, Ariz., said it has secured land for the construction of a 20,000-b/d grassroots hydroskimming refinery in North D...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected