CONGRESS GETS NEW LEADER IN ENERGY SILLINESS CONTEST

Bob Tippee
Editor

US Democrats have pulled ahead of Republicans in the congressional competition for the silliest proposal for energy.

Senate Republicans leaped to an early lead last month with their ill-fated plan to bribe voters with $100 apiece for gasoline (OGJ Online, Apr. 28, 2006).

But House Democrats zipped by them on May 11 when Reps. Rick Boucher of Virginia and John Dingell of Michigan filed legislation to federalize refining.

Citing damage to refineries from last year's hurricanes and consequent increases in fuel prices, the congressmen proposed a Strategic Refining Reserve.

They would commit the secretary of energy to build or restart, then operate, refineries with capacities totaling 5% of US product demand—about 1 million b/d. The aim: to ensure processing capacity is available during supply emergencies warranting withdrawal of crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

Between emergencies, the People's Refineries would produce fuel for military services.

The capacity target represents five average-size refineries. Running such a collection of assets, amounting to a large independent refining company, is a lot to ask of a cabinet officer traditionally selected on the basis of qualities other than energy expertise. But there are always subcontractors.

Of course, the People's Refineries would have to be run under politically acceptable conditions, meaning that they never be visible to anybody; that they prove before construction that they'd never have accidents; that they emit no pollution; that they benefit favored political constituencies; and that they disturb no ecosystems.

Subject as they'd be to political manipulation and unburdened by efficiencies sought by their privately owned counterparts, the People's Refineries would be costly to build and operate. To help with expenses, they'd want to sell whatever of their products the military didn't need—at cost so as not to gouge consumers. The government would pay the rest.

As the People's Refineries came on stream, commercial refineries now supplying the military would have to seek other markets or shut capacity. Expensive refining capacity needing heavy government funding thus would displace commercial capacity now generating tax revenue. Eventually, there'd be no "reserve," only cost.

In the silliness contest, this will be hard for Republicans to beat.

Note: This feature will appear next on May 26, 2006.

(Online May 12, 2006; author's e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

Rosneft advances hydrotreating complex at Syzran refinery

08/29/2014 OAO Rosneft has received a reactor and cold high-pressure separator to be used in the construction of a planned diesel hydrotreating complex at its...

Damaged unit weighs on diesel output at Porvoo refinery

08/29/2014 Repairs remain under way on a damaged hydrogen production unit at Neste Oil Corp.’s 205,000-b/d Porvoo refinery in the Kilpilahti Industrial Area, ...

PDVSA shuts refinery generator for maintenance

08/29/2014 Petroleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA) has shut down the power generation system that supplies its 190,000-b/d Puerto La Cruz refinery in eastern Venezu...

BP confirms fire at Whiting refinery

08/28/2014 An overnight fire at BP PLC’s 413,000-b/d refinery in Whiting, Ind., has resulted in only minimal interruptions to operations at the site, the comp...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected