NPRA faults Senate antitrust reform bill

Nick Snow
Washington Correspondent

WASHINGTON, DC, Apr. 11 -- An antitrust reform bill that US Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) and other senators introduced last week is based on incorrect assumptions and would do substantial harm to US refiners, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association said Apr. 10.

NPRA Pres. Bob Slaughter said the bill, S 2557, starts with a flawed assumption that industry consolidation has led to higher retail oil product prices.

"Today's refining industry is highly competitive. Data do not support the conclusion that acquisitions have increased prices. In fact, we believe companies have become more efficient through mergers and acquisitions plus organic growth. They continue to compete fiercely," he maintained.

Of the 54 existing US refiners, the largest accounts for only about 13% of the nation's total processing capacity, according to Slaughter. Large integrated companies own and operate about 10% of the more than 165,000 retail outlets in the US, he said.

"The Federal Trade Commission thoroughly evaluates every merger proposal, holds industry mergers to the highest standards of review, and subjects normal industry operations to a higher level of ongoing scrutiny," he said.

Mergers have helped many refiners become more efficient, said Slaughter. He noted that Valero Energy Corp. has increased the productive capacity of refineries it has acquired by more than 500,000 b/d in recent years.

Other concerns he expressed were:

-- The bill's provision dealing with refusals to sell crude oil, petroleum products, or natural gas may be an illegal trade barrier. "It is also unclear how the proposal would affect import markets," Slaughter said.

-- Creating a federal-state task force to monitor oil and gas information-sharing may not be necessary since there is no proof that such information-sharing is illegal. Two dozen analyses seem to contradict the assumption that any data are improperly shared, according to NPRA.

-- Attempting to enforce US antitrust laws against the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, as one of the bill's key provisions suggests, is more likely to exacerbate a political situation that is already a cause for concern by applying extraterritorial jurisdiction and waiving the act of state doctrine.

Contact Nick Snow at nsnow@cox.net.

Related Articles

Ukraine gas plant starts up

03/12/2014 KUB-Gas LLC, a partially owned unit of Calgary-based Serinus Energy Inc., has completed and commissioned a gas processing plant at Makeevskoye, Ukr...

DCP Midstream adding processing in DJ, Eagle Ford basins

02/03/2014

DCP Midstream LLC will add nearly 500 MMcfd of natural gas processing capacity in two liquids-rich US basins, the company reported.

Wealth of gas processing, pipeline projects planned for Marcellus-Utica region

02/01/2014 The surge in gas production in the Marcellus shale and imminent follow-on supply from the Utica shale have created a need for processing capacity t...

Growing NGL production alters regional pipeline flows, spurs new gas processing capacity in Utica

02/01/2014 Midstream companies like MarkWest Energy are working hard to increase gas gathering, processing, fractionation, and takeaway capacity to service th...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected