Government fuel choices costly in energy policy

Bob Tippee

The making of energy policy is at its worst when policy-makers assign themselves responsibility for decisions best left to markets.

Omnibus energy legislation is taking the US down that dangerous path.

The bill under discussion in the Senate has taken aboard a renewable-fuel mandate for generators of electricity. It already had an expanded mandate for renewable fuel, meaning ethanol, in gasoline.

And it's much more generous than the House bill with tax breaks for politically preferred energy consumption and production technologies that now don't pass economic muster.

The conference that eventually must try to reconcile the House bill with whatever the Senate passes will be messy. Under heavy pressure from the White House to pass a bill, lawmakers will compromise serious energy issues against parochial favors. The product, if any, could be ugly.

There's nothing wrong with the renewable fuels and other alternatives to conventional sources of energy upheld in the House and Senate bills and in the Bush administration's push for energy legislation.

What's wrong is fuel selection by government. If the market needs alternative fuels, as it does, it will have them in the quantities and according to the schedules that make economic sense. Government efforts to force choices and timing create only inefficiency and cost.

The administration's energy vision illustrates the point. President Bush, leveraging his arguments against exaggerated hope for reducing US reliance on foreign oil, trumpets ethanol and hydrogen as vehicle fuels.

The superficial appeal is great: home-grown energy with diminished carbon emissions. But the production of hydrogen and ethanol requires energy, the preponderance of which comes from fossil fuel, much of it imported.

Forcing ethanol and hydrogen into the market would substantially raise energy costs without delivering on domestic-supply promises fully if at all.

Historically, the US has tended to see its energy priorities most clearly when confronted with a crisis of supply.

Oil and gas prices now demonstrate the verge of such a crisis. They also signal opportunity for new sources of supply—including some, probably, of those that the politicians like and some, almost certainly, that the politicians have yet to imagine.

(Author's e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

Judge bars Anadarko e-mails as evidence in Macondo blowout hearing

03/21/2014 A federal district judge in New Orleans refused to accept e-mails between Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and BP PLC as evidence in a hearing to determine...

Industry group welcomes most UK budget moves

03/21/2014 Oil & Gas UK voiced support for all but one of several measures affecting the offshore producing industry announced in the UK government’s annu...

Analyst urges broader look at Amazon oil resources’ local impacts

03/21/2014 Increasingly disruptive protests are likely if oil, gas, and mining companies and national governments don’t pay closer attention to indigenous pop...

BOEM extends proposed higher offshore liability limit comment period

03/20/2014 The US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management added 30 days to the public comment period for its proposed higher liability limit for offshore oil and ga...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected