Energy bills again hinge on oxygenate issues

Bob Tippee

Energy legislation in the US hinges again on gasoline oxygenates.

In wide-ranging energy bills passed by the House and working through the Senate, big oil and gas provisions relate to ethanol and methyl tertiary butyl ether. Most other major oil and gas items have wiggled out.

Tax changes sought by independent producers have been enacted elsewhere, for example. And the Senate moved leasing of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Coastal Plain into budget legislation.

For the still massive bills that remain, oxygenates might again prove fatal.

For most major oil companies, a priority goal of energy legislation is protection against product-defect lawsuits involving MTBE. The ether, which helps refiners meet gasoline oxygen-content requirements, has appeared in subsurface sources of drinking water. Governments are banning MTBE, and local interests are suing companies that made or sold fuel containing it.

As long as Congress requires oxygen in gasoline, of course, ethanol profits from MTBE's sorrows—to the great pleasure of agricultural interests. But reformulated gasoline doesn't need oxygen in the required concentrations to meet performance specifications. So past energy bills have addressed chemical and political realities by replacing the oxygen content standard with volumetric mandates for already-subsidized ethanol.

For the oil industry, which understands ethanol's performance and economic drawbacks, this presents a dilemma: no ethanol mandate, no energy bill; no energy bill, no MTBE relief. The temptation is strong to make a deal.

Ethanol interests see the issue as simply market expansion by fiat—the bigger the better. They persuaded the Senate committee to increase the proposed mandate to 8 billion gal/year from 5 billion gal/year in 2012.

This was too much for the American Petroleum Institute, which had dealt its way into support for the lower ethanol standard and now rightly—but unconvincingly—says it can't abide the higher.

With luck, incomprehensible energy legislation will fail again, keeping the industry from being complicit in the fleecing of its customers and US taxpayers. The industry can fight its MTBE battle better in the context of legal reform than in energy legislation that looks like a bazaar of favors for special interests.

(Author's e-mail: bobt@ogjonline.com)

Related Articles

AU Energy to acquire Tullow Netherlands unit

09/05/2014 AU Energy BV, a subsidiary of Mercuria Energy Group Ltd., has agreed to acquire Dutch operated and nonoperated L12/L15 block interests and nonopera...

Boardwalk buys Louisiana ethylene pipeline from Chevron

09/04/2014 Boardwalk Pipeline Partners LP has agreed to buy Chevron Petrochemical Pipeline LLC—including the 176-mile Evangeline ethylene pipeline—from Chevro...

Federal judge finds BP E&P negligent in Macondo crude oil spill

09/04/2014 A nearly 5 million bbl crude oil spill following the 2010 Macondo deepwater well blowout in the Gulf of Mexico was the result of operator BP Explor...

Tamarack to buy Suncor’s Wilson Creek assets

09/04/2014 Tamarack Acquisition Corp., a subsidiary of Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd., will acquire Wilson Creek assets in central Alberta from Suncor Energy Inc...

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected