US Senate offshore leasing foes reaffirm opposition

Nick Snow
Washington Correspondent

WASHINGTON, DC, Apr. 20 -- US Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee members from California, Florida, and North Carolina reiterated their strong opposition Apr. 19 to authorization of additional oil and gas leasing of the Outer Continental Shelf or related offshore activity.

But senators from other coastal states, including one who is not on the committee, expressed support for legislation authorizing a state to request a federal inventory of potential resources off its coast.

The exchanges came during a committee hearing on potential offshore resources that included discussions of wind, wave, and tidal technology. But oil and gas dominated the proceedings.

"We recognize there's a need to address energy production. But we're adamantly opposed to oil and gas drilling off our coast," said Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.). "It is a fairly strong consensus among leaders from both parties. I realize that as technologies change, there's a temptation to view things differently. The people of Florida don't."

Sens. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Richard Burr (R-NC) said opposition to offshore oil and gas activity in their states is as strong as ever.

"But I do not want my opposition to preclude other states from reviewing their participation in moratoriums or withdrawals," Burr said. "They should have that opportunity."

Senators' comments
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said a bill he has cosponsored with Sen. Tim Johnson (D-SD) includes a provision under which a coastal state could request a federal offshore inventory (OGJ Online, Apr. 11, 2005). The measure also would instruct the Interior secretary to extend a state's boundary farther into the ocean and permit the US Minerals Management Service to issue leases for natural gas only.

"Federal law treats states differently in terms of onshore and offshore production. In Wyoming, if there is drilling on federal lands, the state gets 50% of the revenues. Offshore, if drilling is beyond 9 miles, the states get nothing. Our proposal would give states 9% of the revenues and another 12.5% as a conservation royalty," Alexander said. An adjacent state also could veto leasing if it could demonstrate that a rig or drillship could be seen from the state's coastline.

Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) said, "There's a lot of emotion on this issue." He is not on the committee but attended the hearing to support one of the witnesses, Virginia state Sen. Frank W. Wagner. A Republican from Virginia Beach, Wagner sponsored a bill that would have given state support to federal efforts to ease OCS leasing moratoriums. The bill was vetoed.

Other senators emphasized the importance of sending more offshore oil and gas revenues directly to coastal states, counties, and communities.

"We need to come up with a way that each state can produce what it can and what it wants and get a share equal to its contribution and not see it go into general federal revenues for every state," said Sen. Mary L. Landrieu (D-La.).

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alas.) echoed Landrieu's revenue-sharing concerns. "If we were to have offshore drilling off Alaska's coast, we would not enjoy the same share we have from our onshore production," she said.

Another witness, Louisiana Natural Resources Sec. Scott A. Angele, suggested that sharing more than 1% of federal offshore revenues with coastal states would encourage those states to pursue oil and gas development more aggressively.

"The federal government has proven that it has the ability to steer investment, as evidenced by deepwater drilling in the gulf and coalbed methane gas onshore," he said.

Sen. Pete V. Domenici (R-NM), the committee's chairman, said: "One of the principal objectives heretofore has been revenues to the federal treasury. I think the time is changing, and the concern should be how we better distribute the money to mitigate impacts, encourage conservation, and provide better assurances of safety and welfare. Simply put, I think we should decide where the money goes."

Referring to the Union Oil Co. spill in the Santa Barbara Channel off California, Feinstein said, "We are all too familiar with the consequences of what happened in 1969. . . Sen. Landrieu and I are poles apart on this, and Louisiana may have different needs than my state. But the [Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf] is a unique area, and we need to be careful."

Technological advances
Other senators and witnesses said it is time to recognize recent technological advances.

"When we began placing coastal areas off limits to energy development in 1981, many of the technologies we use today were not available, and perhaps not even imagined," noted Noble Energy Inc. Chairman and CEO Charles D. Davidson said in written testimony on behalf of the Domestic Petroleum Council and the Independent Petroleum Association of America.

James V. Watkins, a former energy secretary who currently chairs the US Commission on Ocean Policy, agreed.

"I believe that since the technology advances that have been made since the Santa Barbara blowout, we need to review our attitudes," he said. "Offshore production employees care about the environment, too."

Watkins said: "It's not just the risk. To stay on the same old issues, whether it's the spill off Santa Barbara or the Exxon Valdez or a tanker off the coast of France, is a mistake. We haven't had an energy policy since 1992. I think the actual [situation] changes over time, and the perception doesn't."

MMS Director Johnnie Burton called the OCS environmental record "exemplary and improving," noting that there hasn't been a significant OCS platform spill in 35 years.

"The MMS has worked diligently the past 20 years to create a framework for science-based decisions," she said. "It also has increased its inspection activities over 60% since 1999."

Burton said the OCS holds an estimated 60% of the country's oil reserves and 40% of its gas reserves. "However, there is concern that the last assessments occurred more than 25 years ago," she said.

Burton also said oil and gas producers are most qualified to determine if it's feasible to issue leases limited to gas.

"There are areas that are considered gas-prone," she said. "We are not currently authorized to issue gas-only leases. Gas and oil are statutorily tied under MMS authorization. The industry needs to let you know if it can produce only gas, and what would happen if oil was discovered. Would you ask them, for example, to reinject the oil?"

Feinstein and Martinez separately asked the MMS director if the federal government could buy back leases issued but not developed because of subsequent moratoriums. Burton responded that White House action would be needed to address leases off Florida but added that the administration has agreed to buy back 36 leases off California.

"We have been in negotiations the past 3 years to do so," she said. "The Justice Department is the lead negotiator. The problem is that its assessment and the companies' appraisals of what the leases are worth is so far apart that an agreement has not been reached."

Contact Nick Snow at

Related Articles

Stover elected as Noble president, chief executive officer

10/21/2014 Noble Energy Inc. reported that the company has elected David L. Stover as president and chief executive officer. Stover succeeds Charles D. Davids...

Noble posts drilling results for Katmai, Dantzler prospects

09/08/2014 Noble Energy Inc., Houston, has advanced its exploration and appraisal drilling operations on the Katmai prospect on Green Canyon Block 40 and the ...

Leviathan partners, BG sign gas supply letter of intent

06/30/2014 Noble Energy Inc. reported the signing of a nonbinding letter of intent (LOI) between partners in the Leviathan natural gas field offshore Israel a...

Noble to acquire interest in BP E&P deepwater gulf acreage

06/16/2014 Noble Energy Inc., Houston, has reached an agreement with BP Exploration & Production Inc. to acquire 50% of BP E&P’s interest in 17 deepwa...

Noble, Consol to launch Marcellus midstream MLP

06/12/2014 Noble Energy Inc., Houston, and Consol Energy Inc., Pittsburgh, have submitted a confidential draft registration statement on Form S-1 to the US Se...

Forum: Exploration opportunities outnumber available people, capital

06/09/2014 Oil and gas companies today face more emerging exploration opportunities than they have available capital or people, Susan Cunningham, senior vice-...

Forum: Exploration opportunities outnumber available people, capital

05/28/2014 Oil and gas companies today face more emerging exploration opportunities than they have available capital or people, Susan Cunningham, senior vice-...

BLM releases EA for Noble Energy’s eastern Nevada gas project

05/26/2014 The US Bureau of Land Management released an environmental assessment for Noble Energy Inc.’s proposed Huntington Valley natural gas project 7 mile...

Noble to appoint new chief executive officer

04/15/2014 Noble Energy Inc. reported that Charles D. Davidson, chairman and chief executive officer, plans to retire and leave the company’s board on May 1.
White Papers

Pipeline Integrity: Best Practices to Prevent, Detect, and Mitigate Commodity Releases

Commodity releases can have catastrophic consequences, so ensuring pipeline integrity is crucial for p...
Sponsored by

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...
Available Webcasts

Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 


On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!


Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected