New incentives move Alaskan gas line toward negotiation

Nick Snow
Washington Correspondent

HOUSTON, Oct. 27 -- Alaskan government officials and the three major North Slope producers express optimism that they will reach an agreement to build a natural gas pipeline to the Lower 48 states now that several incentives have become federal law.

Gov. Frank H. Murkowski met with executives of Exxon Mobil Corp., BP PLC, and ConocoPhillips during the American Petroleum Institute's annual meeting in Pasadena, Calif. After the meeting, Murkowski said the state would submit an initial proposal to the producers by Oct. 28, and the producers indicated they would try to respond within a week. Both sides want to have a final plan ready when Alaska's legislature meets in January.

The state's efforts to get the pipeline built were clearly helped when its congressional delegation successfully got most of the provisions it wanted moved from the comprehensive energy bill, which is dead for this session, to the fiscal 2005 military construction appropriations bill. The provisions include a loan guarantee that requires the federal government to pay 80% of the first $18 billion spent if the pipeline is not completed.

A second financially significant provision, which became part of a jobs bill, shortens the pipeline's authorized depreciation period to 7 years from the current 15 years allowed under the federal modified accelerated cost recovery system, but keeps the project's class life at 22 years.

These two provisions helped set the stage for negotiation of an agreement that the producers and Alaska hope will provide the fiscal certainty needed for such a mammoth project.

Questions seen
But a leading corporate financial advisor who specializes in oil and gas still sees significant questions that need to be addressed.

David T. Lupia, president of David T. Lupia Inc., Ridgefield, Conn., said that if the first provision simply said that $18 billion of the project's cost would be paid by the federal government, the incentive would be very beneficial.

"As I understand the legislation, however, there are two conditions: one, that there are equity commitments to finance the remaining 20% of the pipeline's cost, and two, that there will be a completion guarantee provided," he said. "This completion guarantee is a limiting factor in the financing of the pipeline. It means that somebody is going to have to be willing to open a checkbook and pay for 20% of the total project cost. Since no one knows what it will be, that's an open-ended commitment. Should the pipeline cost more than $22.5 billion to complete, the equity holders would be on the hook for the remaining costs."

The provision also could put the US energy secretary in the position of having to assess the capability of equity holders to make adequate capital commitments with satisfactory guarantees, according to Lupia. He believes that the three major North Slope producers are the only group with the financial muscle to make such a commitment.

"If it were not for the completion guarantee, my guess is that this would be a done deal. But that guarantee essentially says that somebody has to take an extraordinary risk," Lupia said. "The pipeline would go through high mountain passes. It would be extraordinarily long¿much longer than the trans-Alaskan pipeline¿and we don't know what the sponsors would discover as they built it. What if there was a technical problem in the design and it didn't work as planned? That would involve additional costs that could be substantial."

He emphasized that he doesn't know details of Alaska's new strategy of providing some of the gas pipeline project's equity support and assuming some of its risk.

"To the degree that the state is prepared to shoulder some of the completion risk for constructing the pipeline and some of the economic risk that may exist after it is completed by absorbing pipeline costs that cannot be passed on to the marketplace in the form of a selling price, its participation in the project very well could enhance its viability," Lupia said.

"Exactly how the state might go about assuming that risk is another matter entirely. If it's just a question of supplying capital without taking any risk, I don't really know if that advances the football down the field."

He said the second provision includes an enticement for the producers by giving them what amounts to a 15% tax credit on their North Slope gas production and processing facilities that could cost as much as $2.6 billion to build.

"What's fascinating is that in order for producers to get these benefits, an Alaska natural gas pipeline could not cross into Canada north of the 68th Parallel. This effectively precludes a northern route, which would be much more economical," Lupia said.

"In a way, what has been done is that the government is offering subsidies in the form of debt guarantees and income tax adjustments to improve a less attractive investment alternative. Obviously, Alaska convinced Congress and the federal government that the pipeline should go through as much of the state as possible."

Other provisions
Other Alaskan natural gas pipeline provisions that wound up in the military construction appropriations bill authorize:

-- Streamlined permitting and expedited court review by creating the Office of the Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects.

-- Protection of rights-of-way and permitting certificates granted for an Alaska gas pipeline under the 1976 Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Act. The provision also requires the US Court of Appeals in Washington, DC, to expeditiously hear any judicial complaints about a pipeline.

-- Environmental review provisions identifying the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the lead agency for a single environmental review that must be completed within 18 months of the application being filed. The provision requires FERC to issue a permit within 60 days of completing the environmental review.

-- Alaska control of in-state use of the gas to facilitate use for heating or construction of a petrochemical plant in the state.

-- Fair-competition provisions to assure that all gas producers in Alaska will be able to compete for transmission capacity on the pipeline.

-- A $20 million job-training program in Alaska, including $3 million to construct a facility in Fairbanks. The provision also requires the US labor secretary to make grants to the state for training programs that will include Alaska natives so they can work on the project.

-- Incentives to use US-made steel for the pipeline, to hire Alaskans as construction employees, and to give Alaskans opportunities to invest in the project.

Related Articles

ConocoPhillips revises down $2 billion from budget

01/29/2015 ConocoPhillips has shed an additional $2 billion from its capital expenditures for 2015, decreasing total spending to $11.5 billion from the previo...

Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips join to explore, appraise Gulf of Mexico leases

01/28/2015 Chevron Corp. subsidiary Chevron USA Inc., BP PLC unit BP Exploration & Production Inc., and ConocoPhillips Co. have pledged to work together t...

Conoco's Lance calls for repeal of US crude oil export ban

01/26/2015 The US crude export ban that was imposed in 1975 should be repealed 40 years later to ensure the US oil and gas renaissance continues, ConocoPhilli...

For the US economy, a falling oil price has drawbacks, too

01/05/2015

Cheer in the US about an economic lift from falling oil prices needs qualification.

ConocoPhillips slashes 2015 capital budget

12/22/2014 ConocoPhillips has elected to reduce its 2015 capital budget to $13.5 billion, down 20% compared with this year's budget. The news comes on the hee...

ConocoPhillips slashes 2015 capital budget

12/08/2014 ConocoPhillips has elected to reduce its 2015 capital budget to $13.5 billion, down 20% compared with this year’s budget. The news comes on the hee...

BLM issues final SEIS for Greater Mooses Tooth project in NPR-A

10/30/2014 The US Bureau of Land Management released its final supplemental environmental impact statement for the proposed Greater Mooses Tooth (GMT1) oil an...

Western gulf lease sale attracts $110 million in high bids

08/20/2014 Gulf of Mexico western planning area Lease Sale 238 drew 93 bids from 14 companies over 81 blocks covering 433,823 acres, totaling $109,951,644 in ...

ConocoPhillips, Enap sign deal to study unconventional oil, gas in Chile

08/06/2014 ConocoPhillips and Chile’s state oil company Empresa Nacional del Petroleo (Enap) have signed a technical agreement to jointly conduct geological, ...

White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by

Available Webcasts



Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realties

When Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

When Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected