LNG chain regasification link could prove a bottleneck

Doris Leblond
OGJ correspondent

PARIS, Oct. 21 -- Regasification could well become the bottleneck at the end of the LNG chain as the lack of availability of worldwide LNG production and methane carriers is being curtailed by growing competition among regasification players as well as public opposition to terminal construction.

Such problems also could increase the cost of what is "a simple process, compared to liquefaction" and "a modest part of the LNG chain�only 10% of the overall cost of about 3.9 billion euros including eight 145,000 cu m carriers," according to Alain Goy, head of LNG for Gaz de France's Transport Directorate. Goy spoke at a recent conference in Paris organized by the Association Française du Pétrole.

France's LNG projects
GDF, Goy reminded his listeners, has 40 years of LNG experience, which includes the construction of three terminals in France since 1989 (of which only two remain), the safe uploading of 7,000 methane carriers, the supply of 25% of France's natural gas in the form of LNG, and various international partnerships where it has trained operators and taken part in LNG developments abroad.

GDF's most recent regasification involvements are the Dahej regasification terminal on India's northwest coast, where an innovative process was installed using ambient hot air. Also, GDF currently is involved with the construction of a new near-offshore regasification terminal at Fos Cavaou, which has a landing stage slightly off France's Mediterranean coast.

In Europe, where construction of about a dozen methane tanker terminals are being planned to be added to the 11 existing ones, the ongoing liberalization of the natural gas market is changing matters for receiving operators.

The unbundling of the gas sales and infrastructure businesses also includes LNG terminals.

There also is a regulated regasification tariff available for the cosigner client since 2000.

In addition, there is much pressure being exercised to achieve greater market fluidity. "Therefore", explained Goy, "terminals must have spare capacity available...with no guarantee at the design stage that it will be actually used. If a terminal's full capacity is not used, there cannot be a minimum cost for a regasification contract."

Competition is also growing at the regasification stage. Areas of competition include: similar projects that would serve the same geographic area; companies reserving LNG capacity; and upstream producers eyeing the downstream receiving link. All of these factors could produce bottlenecks until LNG production and the methane carriers to transport it become increasingly available.

Terminal installations
Goy also pointed to the mounting physical obstacles to the installation of regasification terminals.

Besides the "not in my backyard" mentality recently compounded by the public's increasing security fears and its sensitivity to possible pollution, there is the need to find sheltered harbors for importing countries given voluntary limits to eligible sites.

Goy listed the many failures in establishing regasification terminals: In 1995, the Italian public voted against the Montalto de Castro terminal siting as well as the planned Monfalcone terminal; in 1998, there was rejection of the offshore North Taiwan terminal; and in 2003, plans were withdrawn for US terminals in East Harswell, Me., and West Vallejo, Calif.

Implementation of some current projects also are far from clear, Goy noted. For example, a terminal in Long Beach, Calif., was stalled by conflicting jurisdictions; a terminal in Freeport, Tex., was held up by required design changes posed by the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; a terminal in Izmir, Turkey, was held up by delayed deregulation of the Turkish gas market; and a terminal in Baja California in Mexico was held up by a surfeit of projects there.

Clearing these obstacles has a cost, Goy pointed out. Projects are moved elsewhere, as from the US to Mexico, the Bahamas, or Canada, with an impact on network connections. Also, existing sites are extended with consequences on downstream networks, and sites are converted or industrial wasteland is reused.

In addition, new regasification models are being developed that are geared toward limiting their local impact. Examples include offshore terminal projects such as the gravity-based structures in the Gulf of Mexico's Port Pelican and Gulf landings.

Regarding tanker design, the regasification methane carrier now being developed for spot gas sales uses a floating umbilical that hooks to the underside of the vessel.

One disadvantage to the new carrier is that it is required to be immobilized for 130 hr during the regasification and transfer process. This compares with the 12-hr turnaround time of a conventional carrier.

According to Goy, there are two such regasification carriers now being built in South Korea, both due on stream sometime in 2005.

Related Articles

BG’s 2015 budget ‘significantly lower than 2014’

02/03/2015 BG Group plans capital expenditures on a cash basis of $6-7 billion in 2015, a range it says is “significantly lower than 2014” due to “a lower oil...

Live Oak LNG to build Calcasieu Ship Channel liquefaction, export site

02/03/2015 Live Oak LNG LLC, a subsidiary of Parallax Energy LLC, Houston, will invest $2 billion to develop a 5-million tonne/year liquefaction plant and LNG...

Woodside gets NEB approval for British Columbia LNG exports

02/02/2015 Woodside Energy Holdings Pty. Ltd. has received approval from Canada’s National Energy Board on its application for a 25-year natural gas export li...

E&Y: Oil-price collapse to boost global M&A activity in 2015

02/02/2015 The oil-price collapse will facilitate increased global transaction activity in 2015 as companies revise and implement new strategies, according to...

Shell cancels Arrow LNG project

01/30/2015

Royal Dutch Shell PLC has abandoned its plans for what would have been a fourth coal seam gas-LNG project at Gladstone in Queensland.

DOE could meet 45-day LNG export decision deadline, Senate panel told

01/29/2015 The US Department of Energy would have no trouble meeting a 45-day deadline to reach a national interest determination for proposed LNG export faci...

Douglas Channel LNG moves toward 2018 startup

01/29/2015 Exmar NV, EDF Trading, and AIJVLP, a joint venture of AltaGas Ltd. and Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd., have taken full ownership of the 550,000 tonne/year...

Mitsui charters two more LNG ships for Cameron export project

01/29/2015 Mitsui & Co., Ltd., Tokyo, reports contracts for chartering two new ships to transport LNG to Japan from the Cameron LNG export project in Loui...

US House approves bill aimed at increasing LNG exports

01/28/2015 The US House of Representatives passed a bill aimed at increasing US LNG exports by requiring the Department of Energy to determine whether a proje...
White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by
Available Webcasts

On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected