Congressional committees push through sweeping energy package

Maureen Lorenzetti
Washington Editor

WASHINGTON, DC, Apr. 4 -- The US Congress this week moved on several fronts to bring together a sweeping energy bill that Republican leaders say President George W. Bush may sign before the summer driving season ends.

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) wants floor debate on his chamber's proposal next week, possibly Apr. 10. The Senate timetable is slower; the Energy and Natural Resources Committee mark up starts next week with possible floor debate in May. The Senate Finance Committee completed consideration of tax-related measures to the bill on Wednesday.

Most of the pending proposals are similar in scope to legislation considered last year. Perhaps the largest difference is reflected in the House's pending energy tax plan. Last year, the House Ways and Means Committee proposed energy tax incentives that totaled $36 billion over a 10-year period. This time around, the committee marked up an $18 billion proposal that more closely follows a pending $16 billion Senate plan.

Alaska gas line
A key difference between the House and Senate energy tax proposals is over fiscal sweeteners for a proposed $20 billion Alaskan natural gas export line to the Lower 48. The House does not offer any incentives, although lawmakers want to mandate a "southern" construction route favored by the state of Alaska and the Senate.

The most recent tax plan supported by producers is a so-called "hybrid" plan adopted by the Senate Finance Committee earlier this week. It avoids a price floor that several members, particularly from oil producing states in the Lower 48, opposed last year.

Instead, BP PLC and ConocoPhillips support a production tax credit that provides as much as a 52¢/MMbtu credit for Alaska gas transported to market. The credit phases out as the price at the wellhead rises above 83¢/MMbtu. The credit is not available if the price at the wellhead rises above $1.35/MMbtu, indexed for inflation.

Next week the Senate may also consider a related plan for the US government to guarantee up to 80% of the total capital cost of the project. BP and ConocoPhillips argue that the risk of default is low, and there is precedent for policymakers. Loan guarantees previously have been used in Canada and to support troubled industries.

In a related measure, the Senate bill would allow pipeline owners to accelerate depreciation of the asset to 7 years instead of 15 years.

White House consideration
The White House budget request before Congress calls for about $9 billion in energy tax breaks, mostly related to energy efficiency although the Bush administration previously favored extending some marginal well credits, now due to expire Dec. 31. These include temporary suspensions of a rule that limits percentage depletion deductions to 65% of income. A related planned suspension of the 100% net-income limitation for marginal wells also expires this year. Both the House and Senate want to extend that plan through 2006.

Pending House and Senate bills include other domestic production provisions not endorsed by the White House. Projected costs for the production proposals are $6-7 billion over 10 years. Both bills also seek to encourage more energy infrastructure; both would accelerate natural gas pipeline depreciation.

Production incentives
Most pending tax measures related to production are similar to items considered under last year's energy bill. The House bill includes a phased-in marginal well production credit of up to $3/bbl if oil prices fall below $18/bbl and 50¢/Mcf if gas prices drop below $2/Mcf. The maximum production on which a credit could be claimed would be 1,095 boe/year. A Senate provision is similar.

Geological and geophysical costs incurred in connection with oil and gas exploration are amortized over 2 years under both the House and Senate plans. Delay rental payments are amortized over 2 years.

Both bills give producers a credit for producing "non-conventional" fuels for 3 years. The House bill says qualifying fuels are oil from shale or tar sands and gas from geopressured brine, Devonian shale, coal seams, or a "tight formation." Credits are $3/bbl in 2003 and indexed for inflation starting in 2004. Existing Sec. 29 wells drilled in 1980-92 would be eligible for 4 years additional credit. Production over 200 Mcf/d is not eligible. The Senate bill also modifies Sec. 29 and includes a coalbed methane study.

The House bill allows for "business energy credits" to be applied against the alternative minimum tax; repeals the AMT preference for intangible drilling costs for 3 years; and allows enhanced oil recovery credits to be taken against AMT for 3 years.

In a related measure, both the House and Senate provide relief to small refiners facing tougher highway sulfur rules. The measures allow for expensing of up to 75% of the capital costs associated with the rule and provides a 5¢/gal production credit.

Other production incentives
Similar to last year, another portion of the House bill seeks to expand royalty holidays in the Gulf of Mexico. The House Resources Committee on Wednesday marked up its own portion of the energy bill that emphasizes new drilling on petroleum-rich public lands, including a small portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Like last year, the bill largely gives the Sec. of the Interior the discretion to expand royalty relief for marginal oil and gas production during periods of low commodity prices. The bill also reinforces the DOI's existing authority to provide royalty relief for frontier areas off Alaska and in the deepwater gulf. An amendment offered by Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-La.) expands a Minerals Management Service proposal to extend royalty relief to deep natural gas wells on the shelf (OGJ Online, Mar. 26, 2003). Under the MMS plan, lessees would be eligible for royalty relief on existing leases if they are willing to drill for new and deeper prospects more than 15,000 ft below sea level. MMS estimates undiscovered gas resources of up to 20 tcf may underlie this "frontier" area. About 2,400 existing leases are expected to qualify for royalty relief under the proposed rule, MMS said.

But the Tauzin plan expands the MMS "dry hole" incentive to two unsuccessful wells from one drilled to at least 18,000 ft on a tract that subsequently produces natural gas from a successful deep well. Tauzin's measure also calls for royalty relief for 35 bcf of gas produced from any "ultra" deep well of at least 20,000 ft. and expands the eligible volumes eligible for royalty relief in lower water depths.

Critics of the plan, including most of the Resources Committee Democrats, said that DOI does not want to expand what is already a generous royalty relief proposal for deep wells in shallow waters. "I'm flabbergasted," said Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va) when the amendment was introduced Wednesday at the committee markup. "This amendment goes beyond what [Sec. Gale Norton] said she needs."

But Tauzin, a powerful member of the Republican leadership who heads the Energy and Commerce committee, said the measure "builds on the MMS announcement," and does not "slam it down her throat," as opponents on the panel charged.

Another item of interest to industry is a provision that amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act so future DOI assessment studies include resources and not just reserves. It also extends the focus of the studies so regulators detail impediments to developments that include postlease restrictions such as permit delays. The bill also requires DOI and the Department of Energy to inventory resources on the Outer Continental Shelf, including methane hydrate potential.

A related provision directs DOI to improve its oil and gas leasing management and "provide timely action on permits." The Bush administration also is directed to study the idea of having an ombudsman office to facilitate energy project permitting among different government agencies. And the Resources plan allows companies to be reimbursed for environmental compliance through royalty reductions.

ANWR debate
As expected, the committee approved leasing a small portion of the coastal plain in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

"With our troops engaged in Iraq, doesn't it make sense for us to adopt some sensible policies here at home that will boost our energy security?" said Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo (R-Calif.) before the ANWR vote.

The Senate last month rejected an ANWR leasing plan, and Senate Republican leaders say they do not expect to include it in their own energy plan. Senate Democrats meanwhile threatened that any energy bill that contains ANWR leasing will fail this session.

ANWR was not the only piece of the House Resources plan House Democrats scorned. Ranking Member Rahall's opening statement focused on the various royalty relief provisions that he called "misguided relief" for the oil industry.

"It is not for consumers, but for multinational corporations drilling for oil and gas in the federal Gulf of Mexico waters by granting them a taxpayer-subsidized royalty holiday. They get to drill and the taxpayer foots the bill by foregoing royalty payments; an unwarranted drilling incentive at a time of high energy prices, a staggering budget deficit, and the yet unknown full cost of conducting war in Iraq," he said.

A failed Democratic alternative to the Resources package called for encouraging the Alaska gas export line ""rather than exploiting environmentally sensitive areas" such as ANWR and encouraging renewable energy on federal lands.

Energy and Commerce
In a related action, the House Energy and Commerce Committee marked up energy legislation under its jurisdiction. The committee included a proposal to retool the reformulated gasoline program to address states' water contamination concerns connected with the clean fuel additive methyl tertiary butyl ether. Similar to last year, the bill includes a provision to create a 5 billion gal fuel ethanol market by 2015. It does not phase down MTBE but offers merchant producers incentives to switch production to other clean fuel additives. It also gives MTBE the same product liability protection afforded to ethanol and ethyl tertiary butyl ether in last year's Senate bill.

The previous Senate bill updated RFG rules by phasing down MTBE, removing an oxygenate requirement, and protecting fuel ethanol market share through a renewable fuels standard that included a credit trading program.

Oil companies are eager to see an RFG plan that is similar to last year's Senate proposal become law; otherwise individual state efforts to ban MTBE may create a "proliferation of boutique fuels" American Petroleum Institute President Red Cavaney told reporters Thursday.

Cavaney predicted that the chances Congress will pass the measure this year are "very good" even though the House's MTBE liability language is opposed by the same environmental groups that supported last year's Senate proposal.

In other action, the committee expanded the size of the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve to 1 billion bbl from its current 700 million bbl capacity.

Related Articles

ConocoPhillips revises down $2 billion from budget

01/29/2015 ConocoPhillips has shed an additional $2 billion from its capital expenditures for 2015, decreasing total spending to $11.5 billion from the previo...

Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips join to explore, appraise Gulf of Mexico leases

01/28/2015 Chevron Corp. subsidiary Chevron USA Inc., BP PLC unit BP Exploration & Production Inc., and ConocoPhillips Co. have pledged to work together t...

Conoco's Lance calls for repeal of US crude oil export ban

01/26/2015 The US crude export ban that was imposed in 1975 should be repealed 40 years later to ensure the US oil and gas renaissance continues, ConocoPhilli...

For the US economy, a falling oil price has drawbacks, too


Cheer in the US about an economic lift from falling oil prices needs qualification.

ConocoPhillips slashes 2015 capital budget

12/22/2014 ConocoPhillips has elected to reduce its 2015 capital budget to $13.5 billion, down 20% compared with this year's budget. The news comes on the hee...

ConocoPhillips slashes 2015 capital budget

12/08/2014 ConocoPhillips has elected to reduce its 2015 capital budget to $13.5 billion, down 20% compared with this year’s budget. The news comes on the hee...

BLM issues final SEIS for Greater Mooses Tooth project in NPR-A

10/30/2014 The US Bureau of Land Management released its final supplemental environmental impact statement for the proposed Greater Mooses Tooth (GMT1) oil an...

Western gulf lease sale attracts $110 million in high bids

08/20/2014 Gulf of Mexico western planning area Lease Sale 238 drew 93 bids from 14 companies over 81 blocks covering 433,823 acres, totaling $109,951,644 in ...

ConocoPhillips, Enap sign deal to study unconventional oil, gas in Chile

08/06/2014 ConocoPhillips and Chile’s state oil company Empresa Nacional del Petroleo (Enap) have signed a technical agreement to jointly conduct geological, ...
White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by
Available Webcasts

On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.


Oil & Gas Journal’s Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015

Fri, Jan 30, 2015

The  Forecast & Review/Worldwide Pipeline Construction 2015 Webcast will address Oil & Gas Journal’s outlooks for the oil market and pipeline construction in a year of turbulence. Based on two annual special reports, the webcast will be presented by OGJ Editor Bob Tippee and OGJ Managing Editor-Technology Chris Smith.
The Forecast & Review portion of the webcast will identify forces underlying the collapse in crude oil prices and assess prospects for changes essential to recovery—all in the context of geopolitical pressures buffeting the market.


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!


Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected