US energy marketers admit to 'round trip' power trades but deny use of Enron tactics

By OGJ editors
HOUSTON, May 29

Tulsa-based Williams Cos. Inc. has become the latest in a growing number of US energy marketers and traders having to step forward to defend its electricity trading practices to the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other government agencies. Williams was among more than 100 other energy marketing companies—which included Houston-based energy firms Dynegy Inc. and Reliant Resources Inc. and CMS Energy Corp. of Dearborn, Mich.—asked by FERC earlier last week to provide information about so-called 'round-trip' electricity trades, especially those sold into California's power grid. The companies have until May 31 to comply with FERC's request, and many in the last few days have already issued statements either denying or explaining such trading practices.

News of the controversial round-trip trades—which involve simultaneous sales and purchases with the same counterparties at the same price—surfaced while government agencies started their investigation into the trading practices of now-bankrupt energy trader Enron Corp. FERC has since focused its probe of such trades on those that some critics claim may have served to artificially elevate electricity prices last year in power-starved California. When conducted, the trades did not translate into any profit, loss, or cash flow for any of the companies but rather would inflate trading volumes, oftentimes misleadingly, critics charge.

Williams's response
After a review of its own trading activities over the last 2 years, Williams, in a written statement, said that it "did not engage in the strategy of so-called 'round-trip trading' for the purpose of inflating volumes or revenues." Steve Malcolm, Williams chairman, president, and CEO, stated, "Round-trip trading didn't add a nickel to our revenues."
Malcolm added, "Even though the number of trades we've found with these characteristics is extremely small, the very nature of reporting on a net basis means that they are not included in our reported revenues. It clearly does not reflect an ongoing business strategy." Williams noted that it is the only major energy marketing company that accounts for its trading revenues on a net, rather than a gross, basis.

"Williams's trading data shows less than 1% of its reported power and gas trading volumes in 2000 and 2001 had any characteristics now associated with 'round trip trading,'" the company said. Malcolm noted, "It's not a surprise that, in our extensive internal review, we didn't find any alleged Enron-style trading strategies because we are—and always have been—very different from Enron."

In a research note commenting on Williams's reaction to FERC's inquiries, UBS Warburg LLC analyst Ronald Barone stated, "With subpoenas flying, we believe the political pressures against Washington [and] the FERC have grown to the point to where some sort of concession on refunds and/or contracts is likely." In addition, Barone noted that FERC's finite timeframe for companies to conduct their own internal investigations, "could suggest the potential for incremental disclosures down the road as transactions are scrubbed."

Barone added, "This is particularly true, given what appears to be seemingly endless requests from the FERC for information on various types of market activities and the alleged accusations that Enron proactively manipulated the market during a time when billions of dollars of sales or contracts were facilitated."

In a release issued Tuesday, Williams said it plans to issue $1-1.5 billion in common equity and sell an additional $1.5-3 billion in assets over the next 12 months. It said it would also reduce costs by $100 million/year and fund a base-level capital expenditure program with cash flow from operations.

"Williams has taken and continues to take quick decisive action to improve our financial strength," Malcolm said. "Clearly we believe that fully executing our plan should put us very solidly in the investment-grade category and allow our business to achieve its long-term growth potential," he said.

Following release of Williams's plan, credit rating agency Standard & Poor's placed Williams's rating under downgrade status. The new rating is BBB- with a negative outlook. Williams said it was "disappointed?but not surprised" by S&P's announcement.

"[Williams's] management has proven to be very proactive in enhancing the company's liquidity position during a time of duress, following the market turmoil caused by the Enron Corp. bankruptcy," S&P reported.

CMS, Dynegy responses
In a written statement last Friday, CMS Energy said it would establish an internal committee to "investigate matters surrounding round-trip trades" carried out by the company's energy marketing unit, CMS Marketing, Services & Trading (CMS-MST). In a separate statement, also issued Friday, CMS Energy announced the resignation of William T. McCormick Jr., as the company's chairman and CEO. McCormick will be succeeded by fellow CMS Energy board director Kenneth Whipple.

McCormick's resignation marks the company's second for a leading executive in a week. Last week, Tamela W. Pallas resigned from her position as president and CEO of CMS-MST (OGJ Online, May 21, 2002).

Separately, Dynegy CEO and Chairman Chuck Watson stepped down from his positions with the company. During a press conference held Tuesday, company executives downplayed any possible link between Watson's resignation and the continuing investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission into the firm's trading and accounting practices (OGJ Online, May 28, 2002).

In a May 22 FERC filing, Watson said, "We took a comprehensive look at our activities during the 2000-01 timeframe, and we reaffirmed that Dynegy has operated within the rules and protocols established by the California Independent System Operator and the California Power Exchange."

Watson noted in that filing, "Dynegy has consistently participated in discussions with federal and state regulators with the goal of improving California market conditions and is committed to continued open dialogue."

Reliant Resources response
Reliant Resources, a unit of Reliant Energy Inc., this month announced preliminary findings of its review of power trading transactions involving round-trip trades. On May 10 the company canceled its $500 million, 10-year debt private placement when it realized—subsequent to the pricing of the debt offering—that it had "likely engaged" in the practice of round-trip trading.

"While Reliant Resources is still completing its review of these trades, to date it believes that it engaged in trades of this nature on the order of 30 million Mw-hr in 1999, 30 million Mw-hr in 2000, and 78 million Mw-hr and 45 bcf of gas in 2001," the company said. These transactions, the firm noted, increased revenues by about 10% over the 3-year period.

In future recording of such transactions, the company said that it would consider presenting all mark-to-market transactions on a net, rather than gross, basis. "These transactions were inconsistent with our company philosophy," said Steve Letbetter, chairman, president, and CEO. "These transactions resulted from some misguided employees who believed that being higher in the league tables of energy trading was important. These types of transactions are no longer occurring at Reliant and will not occur in the future," Letbetter said.

Related Articles

Williams postpones Geismar ethylene sales

12/31/2014 Williams Partners LP once again has postponed sales of ethylene production from its newly rebuilt Geismar, La., olefins plant amid ongoing efforts ...

Williams Partners, Access Midstream Partners to merge

10/27/2014 Williams Partners LP and Access Midstream Partners LP, both owned by Williams Cos., Tulsa, have agreed to merge. Williams in June purchased the rem...

Williams CEO details regulatory hurdles, growth strategy

10/07/2014 Crude oil and natural gas pipeline systems in the US are growing at a very rapid pace as new infrastructure is introduced in an effort to optimize ...

Williams to buy Access Midstream Partners

06/16/2014 Williams, Tulsa, has agreed to acquire the 50% general partner interest it doesn’t now own in Access Midstream Partners LP, Oklahoma City, along wi...

Williams Partners to buy Canadian assets from Williams for $1.2 billion

02/27/2014 Williams Partners LP, Tulsa, has agreed to acquire Williams Cos. Inc.’s Alberta operations for $1.2 billion. The transaction is expected to close F...

Virginia gas pipeline blast injures five

09/15/2008 A natural gas pipeline exploded in Appomattox County, Virginia, the morning of Sept. 14, leveling one home and injuring five people.

FERC issues draft EIS for Oregon LNG terminal, pipeline

09/03/2008 A proposed LNG project in Coos Bay, Ore., would have limited adverse environmental impacts, the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission concluded i...

Williams, TransCanada propose gas pipeline

03/19/2008 Williams Cos. and TransCanada are evaluating joint development of Sunstone Pipeline, a major transmission line that would transport natural gas sup...

House Energy subcommittee to examine pipeline safety regulations

03/14/2008 A House Energy and Commerce Committee will review the 2006 pipeline safety act on Mar 12, but the hearing can be expected to go beyond natural gas ...
White Papers

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...

6 ways for Energy, Chemical and Oil and Gas Companies to Avert the Impending Workforce Crisis

As many as half of the skilled workers in energy, chemical and oil & gas industries are quickly he...
Sponsored by
Available Webcasts


Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected