Oil-for-aid rollover just delaying inevitable over Iraqi oil supply disruption

The United Nations Security Council's approval to extend the Iraqi oil-for-aid program for another 6 months would, at first glance, seem to deflate the oil market expectations outlined in this space last week.

Instead, it really is just delaying the inevitable day of reckoning when Iraqi oil supply prospects collide with the geopolitical and military objectives of the US-led coalition in the war on terrorism. Discovery of any "smoking gun" involving Iraqi complicity in terrorist acts or continued work on prohibited weapons manufacture would accelerate that day of reckoning sharply.

US-Russian deal?
The latest rollover of the oil-for-aid sales program was engineered jointly by the US and Russia via a compromise that has been hailed as further evidence of growing cooperation between Washington and Moscow since Sept. 11.

The compromise has its roots in a longstanding dispute between Russia and the US over the UN sanctions against Iraq. The latest flare-up in that dispute occurred this past spring when the program was again up for a 6-month renewal. The US and UK had sought to reform the sanctions program at that time to allow greater flow of civilian goods into Iraq but at the same time clamp down on Iraqi imports of goods with potential militiary applications and resume UN inspections of Iraqi arms programs. Russia's threatened veto at the time caused that plan to be shelved.

Under the compromise, Russia agreed to approve by May 30 a new list of goods requiring UN review before Iraq can import them. The US, meanwhile, has agreed to Russia's oft-repeated call for a comprehensive settlement of sanctions issues that would set the stage for ultimately lifting the military embargo on Iraq. What is specifically requested here is a need to clarify just what steps Iraq must take in order to have the sanctions lifted.

At least one self-styled oil market expert-whose background is anesthesiology and a propensity for picking oil company stocks-has jumped to the conclusion that this compromise represents the beginnings of a "new world order" in oil markets, in which Russia is positioning itself and the other former Soviet republics as a reliable alternative to OPEC oil supplies. This stock-picker goes so far as to suggest that part of the compromise includes the US softening its position on Iraq. By implication, this would also suggest that Russia's recent defiance of OPEC is part of the "deal," i.e., a tradeoff on the US easing its stance on Iraqi sanctions in exchange for a low oil price regime that could jump-start the US economy.

If that latter view were true, it would accelerate the revival of Iraq's oil sector much faster than anyone had expected and represent a long-term depressant on oil prices.

That's a massive if.
First, it is unthinkable that-the potential for political suicide aside-President George W. Bush would abdicate a personal moral responsibility to allow Iraqi sanctions to be lifted without a return of UN weapons inspectors to Iraq. The Bush administration has repeatedly cited Iraq as a chief sponsor of terrorism in the world, and it is no secret that Iraq remains in the US crosshairs in the war on terrorism-especially with the mounting evidence of Iraq's ties to Osama bin Laden's terrorist network and intelligence reports suggesting that Baghdad has continued work on weapons of mass destruction despite the sanctions. To suddenly reverse himself on Iraq merely for the sake securing low oil prices for the US would represent a geopolitical obtuseness and pandering appeasement of a scope to make Neville Chamberlain at Munich seem positively Churchillian. It just doesn't wash.

It isn't cynical to suggest that the compromise does represent a mutual accord by the US and Russia to postpone the possibility of an Iraqi oil supply disruption until second half 2002, when by many accounts the world economy is expected to begin its recovery. It is an unfathomable leap from there to suggest the Bush administration would overlook the continuing threat Saddam Hussein poses to the world, and the US in particular, for the sake of joining with Russia to undermine OPEC.

The same cooler heads that prevailed when the Wolfowitz camp in the Bush administration wanted to take the antiterrorism campaign to Baghdad while simultaneously waging war in Afghanistan have have likely fashioned this delay game as well.

The real question for now is how long both Russia and Saudi Arabia want to play their own delay game in working up production cuts to keep oil prices out of the cellar. The betting here is that the Russians likely will blink sooner rather than later and together with the Saudis implement some face-saving compromise that will still leave markets a bit oversupplied but not falling off a cliff because of the winter demand pickup.

The real question for a little later is what happens after Osama bin Laden and other key figures of the Al-Qaeda terrorist network have been brought to justice (which, in this corner, means killed). Perhaps after the first of the year, if that richly deserved end has come about, the Bush administration will deem it necessary to unveil the information it likely is harboring for now regarding Iraq and terrorism. When the elements of a Phase 2 in the war on terrorism begin to gel and that puts Iraq in the US sights again, the status of an oil-for-aid program will be moot.

Even if that takes much longer, by the time the sanctions program comes under review again, the US will not-cannot-change its stance on Iraqi sanctions and weapons inspections. Together with the likelihood that the US antiterrorist campaign will focus, at least rhetorically if not in action, increasingly on Baghdad, there still remains a better than 50-50 chance that Iraq's (legal) oil supplies will come off the market before second half 2002.

Rest assured that the Bush administration will provide the "clarification" Russia seeks on what it would take to get Iraqi sanctions lifted. And Iraq won't like what is clarified one bit. Furthermore, Russia recognizes the need for a weapons inspection regime too.

If there remains some question over a US-Russia deal that would allow an eventual lifting of sanctions on Iraq without a weapons inspection regime, consider this quote, courtesy of the Associated Press, from Russia's UN ambassador, Sergey Levrov:

"The only way to radically solve the Iraqi problem is to ensure that international disarmament monitoring resumes in Iraq in conjunction with the suspension and lifting of sanctions, and the only way to achieve this is to eliminate ambiguities which exist in the [1999 UN] resolution [to ease sanctions in return for Baghad's cooperation with weapons inspectors."

That statement could allow the Russians some rhetorical wiggle room later as what timing is implied by the phrase "in conjunction."

But there is no wiggle room in President Bush's own rhetoric on the issue. Only this week, he demanded that Iraq must allow UN weapons inspectors to return or "face the consequences."

With our country at war in a conflict likely to spread, how could we believe otherwise?

OGJ Hotline Market Pulse
Latest Prices as of Nov. 30, 2001

Click here to enlarge image

null

Click here to enlarge image

null

Nymex unleaded

Click here to enlarge image

null

Nymex heating oil

Click here to enlarge image

null

IPE gas oil

Click here to enlarge image

null

Nymex natural gas

Click here to enlarge image

null

Related Articles

UKCS report cites need for deep cost cuts

02/24/2015

The struggling producing industry on the UK Continental Shelf needs deep cost cuts, according to the Oil & Gas UK’s Activity Survey 2015.

IHS: Crude transported by Keystone XL would be consumed in US

02/24/2015 Most, if not all, of the crude oil that would be transported via the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to the US Gulf Coast would not be exported, and ...

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil prices retreat to below $50/bbl

02/24/2015 US light, sweet crude oil prices for April delivery settled below $50/bbl on the New York market Feb. 23, and analyst said oversupply fears were li...

API: US oil product demand reached highest January level since 2008

02/23/2015 US oil product demand rose 1.5% year-to-year to an average 19.2 million b/d in January, its highest level for the month since 2008, the American Pe...

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil prices slip on ample oil supply

02/23/2015 US light, sweet crude oil prices for March delivery fell during Feb. 20 trading and settled above $50/bbl on the New York market. Some analysts sug...

EOG Resources’ budget down 40% to $4.9-5.1 billion

02/20/2015 EOG Resources Inc., Houston, plans a capital budget of $4.9-5.1 billion in 2015 including production facilities and midstream expenditures, represe...

BHI’s rig count reaches 5-year low; forecast projects more losses

02/20/2015 The US drilling rig count fell 48 units—markedly fewer compared with declines in recent weeks—to settle at 1,310 rigs working during the week ended...

More pragmatism urged for developing Eastern Mediterranean gas

02/20/2015 Eastern Mediterranean nations should abandon inflated expectations and adopt more realistic approaches to developing their natural gas resources, s...

MARKET WATCH: NYMEX crude oil prices down on US supply build

02/20/2015 US light, sweet crude oil prices for March delivery settled at slightly above $51/bbl on the New York market Feb. 19 after a government weekly repo...
White Papers

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...

Accurate Thermo-Fluid Simulation in Real Time Environments

The crux of any task undertaken in System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis is striking a balance between ti...
Available Webcasts


Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected