'Unprecedented' safety requirements add millions and months to pipeline project


Sam Fletcher
OGJ Online

It will take Longhorn Partners Pipeline LP another 6 months to implement additional safety features that will add millions to the cost of a $399 million pipeline project, began in 1995, to carry refined products across Texas from Houston to El Paso, a spokesman for that limited partnership said Tuesday.

US Environmental Protection Agency officials Monday approved an "unprecedented" safety and mitigation program that brings that project a giant step closer to completion. That move came on instructions from US President Bill Clinton's top aides on the White House Council on Environmental Quality in September after Longhorn Partners agreed to 40 steps to reduce ecological dangers along the pipeline route.

Included are "extraordinary safety and mitigation measures that have not been required on any pipeline in the country" and which meet or exceed any future pipeline safety requirements under consideration in congress, said government officials.

The pipeline will be the first to ban products that contain methyl tertiary butyl ether or similar additives�tertiary amyl methyl ether, ethyl tertiary butyl ether, di-isopropyl ether�in greater than trace amounts, EPA officials said.

The 700-mile pipeline includes a 450-mile section from Houston to Crane in the Permian Basin that was built in the 1950s to carry West Texas crude to Gulf Coast refineries. Longhorn Partners acquired that pipeline in 1995, with the aim of reversing its flow to carry gasoline and other refined products from Houston-area refineries to markets in West Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona.

That original pipeline crosses the environmentally sensitive Edwards Aquifer in central Texas, an unique groundwater system that includes one of the most prolific artesian aquifers on the globe. It is officially designated as the sole source of drinking water for some 1.5 million people, including the cities of San Antonio and Austin, the Texas capital.

Protection, observation measures
As part of the environmental agreement, Longhorn Partners will replace 19 miles of 1950s-vintage pipe over a section of the Edwards Aquifer near Austin with thicker-walled pipe. The replacement pipe is to be buried at a depth to reduce the potential for third-party damage, with a concrete barrier installed over it as additional protection.

The partners also are required to design and develop a trench across that section of the aquifer's recharge and contributing zones to capture any accidental release. They also must install a system across the recharge and nearby contributing zones that is capable of detecting "even very small leaks" within 12-20 minutes of initial discharge.

Pipeline pump stations are to be inspected every 2 1/2 days in environmentally sensitive and highly populated areas. Remote cameras are to be installed to monitor all pump stations prior to start up.

Longhorn Partners formed an accident response partnership with Boots & Coots International Well Control Inc. of Houston to ensure quick response to any emergency. Pipeline officials said they will fund an office for Boots & Coots in Central Texas that, in addition to the emergency firm's existing oil field facilities on the Gulf Coast and in the Permian Basin, will assure prompt reaction at any point along the pipeline.

Moreover, new valves are being installed on the pipeline in sensitive areas like the Edwards Aquifer and river crossings that will let operators quickly shut down the flow of products through the pipeline and safely drain the line if necessary. "We had already installed some of those valves and are adding more as a result of the study," said Michael Patterson, partnership spokesman.

Under the environmental agreement, Longhorn must perform semiannual pipe-to-soil potential surveys in sensitive areas along the pipeline�twice as often as currently required by Department of Transportation regulations, officials said.

The partnership also must do aerial and ground surveillance of the pipeline every day in the Edwards Aquifer area; every 2 1/2 days in other environmentally sensitive and highly populated areas; and weekly in all other regions. All of those schedules also are more frequent than now required by law, officials said.

Pipeline marker signs in both English and Spanish must be posted at more frequent intervals along the pipeline route than now specified by industry standards, including at all above-ground facilities and on each side of public road, water and railroad crossings.

In addition, Longhorn Pipeline is required to cease operation during "extreme flood conditions" at its Pedernales River crossing. Longhorn Partners must pay an outside contractor to test water quality at 12 locations in proximity to stream crossings and arrange alternate water supplies for municipalities and private water-well owners "that have sensitive groundwater resources" along the pipeline route.

The additional safety and mitigation measures will add "tens of millions" of dollars to the pipeline's total cost, partnership officials told OGJ Online.

Longhorn Partners has already installed a new state-of-the-art system that will monitor pipeline operations every few seconds around the clock. It measures volumes entering and exiting the pipeline, along with suction and discharge pressures at pump stations to detect any leakage.

Some of the mitigation measures also will improve the safety of two other pipelines that share the same corridor with Longhorn Pipeline along much of its route, officials said.

From 1995 through 1998, the partnership cleaned, tested, and upgraded the existing crude oil pipeline with new safety and environmental protections as part of its conversion. The line also was extended, including a 9-mile addition in the Houston area and a 250-mile stretch across West Texas to El Paso on the Mexican border.

A new spur was built from Crane to Odessa in the heart of the Permian Basin, Texas' main oil-producing area, where gasoline and other refined products typically cost 10-20�/gal more than in those areas directly served by Gulf Coast refineries.

The proposed pipeline would provide a method for Gulf Coast refiners to move large quantities of products at lower costs to West Texas. Proponents claim the cheaper supply of cleaner-burning motor fuels could help reduce the air pollution that has become a sensitive international issue between the border cities of El Paso and Juarez, Mexico.

Interconnections with other pipelines in West Texas could also move refined products into New Mexico and Arizona. That would relieve pressures on the California market since that state now exports large quantities of gasoline and diesel fuel into Arizona, proponents said.

Troubled legal history
But in 1998, several West Texas landowners filed a federal lawsuit against Longhorn Partners, the EPA and DOT to halt the proposed pipeline because of its alleged threat to the Edwards Aquifer. All but two of the landowners later withdrew from the suit, which was subsequently joined by the City of Austin, the Lower Colorado River Authority, the Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District, and others.

Media reports and statements by property owners who dropped out of the suit later indicated that the original lawsuit was funded by Navajo Refining Co. of Artesia, NM, that sells gasoline and diesel into the West Texas, New Mexico and Arizona markets. Longhorn Partners subsequently sued Navajo in state court for illegal interference with existing and prospective contracts and for anti-trust violations (OGJ, July 20, 1998, p. 36).

Meanwhile, the federal judge issued a temporary injunction against the pipeline. In 1999, parties to that original suit agreed to a voluntary environmental assessment jointly directed by EPA and DOT. As part of that study, an outside contractor analyzed 8,100 segments of the pipeline, checking for safety along its entire length.

A draft report of that assessment was released in October 1999 with a preliminary finding of no significant impact on the environment by the proposed pipeline.

If final judicial approval is granted by the federal judge, Longhorn Partners expects to open the pipeline by mid-2001.

Related Articles

US House vote sends Keystone XL approval bill to Obama’s desk

02/12/2015 The US House of Representatives voted by 270 to 152 to pass S. 1, which would deem the proposed Keystone XL crude oil pipeline approved more than 6...

Australia Pacific LNG receives first gas at Curtis Island

02/12/2015 The Origin Energy Ltd.-led Australia Pacific LNG (APLNG) has reached a major milestone with first gas arriving at the group’s LNG plant on Curtis I...

TransCanada challenges EPA’s comments on Keystone XL SEIS

02/11/2015 TransCanada Corp. responded to the Feb. 2 comment letter from the US Environmental Protection Agency on the US Department of State’s final suppleme...

New study finds wide variations in gathering systems’ methane samples

02/11/2015 Samples of methane emissions from 114 natural gas gathering stations and 16 processing plants across 13 states found wide variations in amounts act...

Williams, DCP start gas flow from Keathley Canyon Connector

02/10/2015 Williams, through its general partner ownership of Williams Partners, and DCP Midstream Partners LP have started operations from their newly extend...

Senators’ bill aims to curb flaring by expediting permit process

02/09/2015 North Dakota and Wyoming’s US senators introduced legislation that aims to capture methane and reduce flaring by expediting procedures for obtainin...

MOL, Transpetrol complete Hungary-Slovakia crude line expansion

02/09/2015 MOL Group and Transpetrol AS finished reconstruction and capacity expansion of the Friendship I-Adria oil pipeline leg between Szazhalombatta, Hung...

NCOC lets $1.8-billion pipeline contract for Kashagan field

02/06/2015 North Caspian Operating Co. (NCOC) has let a $1.8-billion engineering and construction contract to ERSAI Caspian Contractor LLC, a subsidiary of Sa...

AOPL releases 2015 safety performance and strategic planning report

02/06/2015 The Association of Oil Pipe Lines is committed to further improvements despite a 99.99% safe petroleum liquids delivery rate, AOPL Pres. and Chief ...
White Papers

Pipeline Integrity: Best Practices to Prevent, Detect, and Mitigate Commodity Releases

Commodity releases can have catastrophic consequences, so ensuring pipeline integrity is crucial for p...
Sponsored by

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...
Available Webcasts


Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

When Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


The Future of US Refining

Fri, Feb 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Feb. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on the future of US refining as various forces this year conspire to pull the industry in different directions. Lower oil prices generally reduce feedstock costs, but they have also lowered refiners’ returns, as 2015 begins with refined products priced at lows not seen in years. If lower per-barrel crude prices dampen production of lighter crudes among shale plays, what will happen to refiners’ plans to export more barrels of lighter crudes? And as always, refiners will be affected by government regulations, particularly those that suppress demand, increase costs, or limit access to markets or supply.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected