DEMAGOGUERY OVER ROYALTY REFORM

Over the not-so-complex issue of oil valuation for royalty calculation, US producers have become subject to classic demagoguery.

In what has become a nasty controversy, the federal Department of Interior and its Minerals Management Service have done one right thing and two wrong things.

The right thing is to have acted on questions about the validity of using posted prices as an expression of value on which to base federal royalties.

The first wrong thing is to have proposed an unworkable remedy then refused to make it right.

For all the name-calling over royalty reform, there is not much disagreement over the basics.

The industry agrees that posted prices have lost their utility as indicators of fair market value at the lease, on which royalties are supposed to be based. Market changes have made that so.

Readily acknowledging the problem, therefore, the industry has supported reform of valuation procedures.

What it has opposed is Interior's flawed approach to valuation. The department at first wanted to index oil values to prices of futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It later changed the value base to spot prices at market centers.

The change doesn't solve the problems of validity and complexity. Values calculated on the basis of proxy crudes adjusted for location and grade would be no more valid and no less subject to challenge than those derived from low-traffic postings.

Furthermore, the Interior scheme fixes the value downstream of the point of production, a money grab that conflicts with the statutory requirement that royalty be based on value at the lease.

Interior has stubbornly clung to its fatally flawed approach. Worse, it has allowed the industry's support for reform to be portrayed as a confession of guilt. That's the second wrong thing it has done in all this-and maybe the worst.

Congress has addressed Interior's intransigence by denying funding for the royalty reform program. When it first imposed the budgetary moratorium, it directed Interior to restudy the issue. The department mostly balked.

So the moratorium comes up annually at budget time, giving demagogues in Congress the chance to flail unfairly at an industry that wants to fix the problem, not replace an old problem with a new one.

Example: The headline of a press release from Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) depicts the issue as "Big Oil's 'Rip-off' of Oil Royalties." In a rich demonstration of her misunderstanding of the issue, she rails about making oil companies "pay their fair share of oil royalties when they drill on federal land." Pay royalties when they drill?

Example: Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) calls the moratorium a "special interest rider." When the Senate early in September approved an amendment, sponsored by Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-Tex.), extending the funding moratorium, Maloney declared, "I am deeply disappointed that the Senate put the interests of big oil ahead of America's schoolchildren." Schoolchildren?

It is, of course, too much to hope that liberal politicians from New York or California would ever bother to learn anything about the oil business before trashing it for the grandstands.

But Interior's unworkable proposal has provided too convenient a platform for the demagoguery. Its handling of the issue, from the wholesale misconception apparent in the original proposal to the stonewalling of Congress and refusal to budge off an indefensible position, has been irresponsible.

Related Articles

Recent CSIS report outlines main US oil infrastructure challenges

02/27/2015 The US crude oil renaissance has created strong demand for expanded US transportation systems, resulting in five primarily challenges, a recent Cen...

Petroleum detected in fish tested after Yellowstone River pipeline spill

02/26/2015 Detectable levels of petroleum were found in tests of fish pulled from the Yellowstone River downstream from a broken petroleum pipeline near Glend...

Suriname bid round draws lackluster response

02/26/2015 The dramatic fall in oil prices is being blamed for the lack of interest shown by international oil companies (IOCs) in the deepwater offshore Suri...

House panel launches probe of DOS’s Keystone XL application process

02/26/2015 The US House Oversight and Government Reform Committee began an investigation of the US Department of State’s environmental impact statement for th...

Uganda announces tender for Albertine Graben acreage

02/26/2015

The virtually untouched Albertine Graben of Uganda may contain more than 6.5 billion bbl of oil resources according Ugandan officials.

BLM Utah office adopts USFS leasing analysis for Fishlake Forest

02/26/2015 The US Bureau of Land Management’s Utah state office will adopt the US Forest Service’s final environmental impact statement and record of decision...

New regulator lists UKCS ‘priority actions’

02/25/2015 The UK’s Oil and Gas Authority, responding to calls from industry and the government for prompt support of UK Continental Shelf (UKCS) exploration ...

Grizzly files OSCA application with AER for Thickwood

02/25/2015

Grizzly Oil Sands ULC, Calgary, has filed an Oil Sands Conservation Act application with Alberta Energy Regulator for the Thickwood project.

BLM moving toward strategy for Greater Sage Grouse, Jewell says

02/25/2015 Calling it a remarkable example of federal, state, and local cooperation, US Sec. of the Interior Sally Jewell said the US Bureau of Land Managemen...
White Papers

Pipeline Integrity: Best Practices to Prevent, Detect, and Mitigate Commodity Releases

Commodity releases can have catastrophic consequences, so ensuring pipeline integrity is crucial for p...
Sponsored by

AVEVA’s Digital Asset Approach - Defining a new era of collaboration in capital projects and asset operations

There is constant, intensive change in the capital projects and asset life cycle management. New chall...
Sponsored by

Transforming the Oil and Gas Industry with EPPM

With budgets in the billions, timelines spanning years, and life cycles extending over decades, oil an...
Sponsored by

Asset Decommissioning in Oil & Gas: Transforming Business

Asset intensive organizations like Oil and Gas have their own industry specific challenges when it com...
Sponsored by

Squeezing the Green: How to Cut Petroleum Downstream Costs and Optimize Processing Efficiencies with Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Solutions

As the downstream petroleum industry grapples with change in every sector and at every level, includin...
Sponsored by

7 Steps to Improve Oil & Gas Asset Decommissioning

Global competition and volatile markets are creating a challenging business climate for project based ...
Sponsored by

The impact of aging infrastructure in process manufacturing industries

Process manufacturing companies in the oil and gas, utilities, chemicals and natural resource industri...
Sponsored by

What is System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis?

This paper will explain some of the fundamentals of System Level Thermo-Fluid Analysis and demonstrate...
Available Webcasts


The Alternative Fuel Movement: Four Need-to-Know Excise Tax Complexities

When Thu, Jun 4, 2015

Discussion on how to approach, and ultimately embrace, the alternative fuel market by pulling back the veil on excise tax complexities. Taxes may be an aggravating part of daily operations, but their accuracy is crucial in your path towards business success.

register:WEBCAST



On Demand

Prevention, Detection and Mitigation of pipeline leaks in the modern world

Thu, Apr 30, 2015

Preventing, detecting and mitigating leaks or commodity releases from pipelines are a top priority for all pipeline companies. This presentation will look at various aspects related to preventing, detecting and mitigating pipeline commodity releases from a generic and conceptual point of view, while at the same time look at the variety of offerings available from Schneider Electric to meet some of the requirements associated with pipeline integrity management. 

register:WEBCAST


Global LNG: Adjusting to New Realities

Fri, Mar 20, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s March 20, 2015, webcast will look at how global LNG trade will be affected over the next 12-24 months by falling crude oil prices and changing patterns and pressures of demand. Will US LNG production play a role in balancing markets? Or will it add to a growing global oversupply of LNG for markets remote from easier natural gas supply? Will new buyers with marginal credit, smaller requirements, or great need for flexibility begin to look attractive to suppliers? How will high-cost, mega-projects in Australia respond to new construction cost trends?

register:WEBCAST


US Midstream at a Crossroads

Fri, Mar 6, 2015

Oil & Gas Journal’s Mar. 6, 2015, webcast will focus on US midstream companies at an inflection point in their development in response to more than 6 years shale oil and gas production growth. Major infrastructure—gas plants, gathering systems, and takeaway pipelines—have been built. Major fractionation hubs have expanded. Given the radically changed pricing environment since mid-2014, where do processors go from here? What is the fate of large projects caught in mid-development? How to producers and processors cooperate to ensure a sustainable and profitable future? This event will serve to set the discussion table for the annual GPA Convention in San Antonio, Apr. 13-16, 2015.

This event is sponsored by Leidos Engineering.

register:WEBCAST


Emerson Micro Motion Videos

Careers at TOTAL

Careers at TOTAL - Videos

More than 600 job openings are now online, watch videos and learn more!

 

Click Here to Watch

Other Oil & Gas Industry Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Stay Connected